In this question, a statement is given followed by two courses of action numbered I and II. You have to take the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given sequence of action is to be taken logically. Statement: Farmers are unable to sell their products due to low demand. Course of action: I: The government should buy products from farmers at a price below the cost price and export them at a higher price. II: Government should not interfere in this situation as it will cause trouble to the farmers.?

LohaHridoy
  1. Neither I nor II follows
  2. Only I follows  
  3. I and II both follow 
  4. Only II follows 

0 like 0 dislike
1 views
Share with your friends

1 Answers

AhmedNazir

Call

Option 1 : Neither I nor II follows

Statement: Farmers are unable to sell their produce due to low demand.

As statement says Farmers are unable to sell their products due to low demand.

Course of action:

I: The government should buy products from farmers at a price below the cost price and export them at a higher price.

If the government buys their product below the cost price this will not help them to recover their loss, hence this is not the right statement to help the farmers.

Hence, the course of action I do not follows.

II: Government should not interfere in this situation as it will cause trouble to the farmers.

Government should interfere in this situation otherwise how farmers sell their product on a large scale. Hence, this is also not the right statement to help farmers.

Hence, the course of action II do not follows.

Hence, Option (1) is correct.

Some rules to solve Statements and Course of action questions must be kept in mind while solving it.

Rule 1. Have an unbiased and neutral mind frame. Individual perception must not be used to judge the course of action to be taken.

Rule 2. The first step should be to identify the root cause of the problem. Once the problem is solved, a logical mindset should be employed to figure out the course of action.

Rule 3. There must be no extremity involved in the course of action.

Rule 4. A course of action must be able to solve, reduce, or minimize the problem given in the situation.

Rule 5. The course of action can be said to solve/reduce the problem when it is an established fact, when it is logically possible and when it is known from experience. 

0 like 0 dislike
1 views
Talk Doctor Online in Bissoy App
Given below is a statement followed by two courses of actions. Assuming everything in the statement to be true, irrespective of the commonly known facts, decide which of the two suggested course(s) of action logically follow for pursuing Statement: There is a shortage of water in Delhi during summers. Course of action 1: There should be more water conservation projects initiated by the government of Delhi. Course of action 2: The government encourage rain water harvesting in all new and existing residential complexes.?

Option 2 : Both course of action 1 and course of action 2 follow.The first course of action follows because the Delhi government should initiate more water conservation projects because of...

1 Answers 1 views
A statement is followed by three courses of action numbered I, I and III. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true and on the basis of the information given in the statement, decide which of the suggested courses of action should be followed. Statement: The Government has put in best efforts to eradicate polio but still a few cases are reported from some areas. Courses of Action: I. Public should be made more aware about the issue so that public participation in eradicating polio increases. II. It is the government’s responsibility and the public has no role in eradication of polio, hence public shall not be involved. III. Both government and the public should continue putting in their best efforts to eradicate polio.?

Option 4 : Only actions I and III should be followedCourses of Action: I. Public should be made more aware about the issue so that public participation in eradicating polio increases → should...

1 Answers 1 views
In the question, a statement is given followed by two arguments 1 and 2. You have to take the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, support the given statement. Statement: Should we declare war on our neighboring country Pakistan Argument: 1. Yes, because the latter has been involved in many terrorist activities in India. This is the only way to stop them from doing such things. 2. No, war will cause great loss of money, infrastructure and human life.?

Option 3 : Only Argument 2 is strongStatement: Should we declare war on our neighboring country Pakistan? Argument: 1. Yes, because the latter has been involved in many terrorist activities in India. This...

1 Answers 1 views
In the question, three statements are given followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, logically follows from the given statement. Statement 1: All data are raw. Statement 2: None of the information is raw. Statement 3: All information is caselet. Conclusion I: Some data is information. Conclusion II: Some raw are caselets.?

Option 3 : Neither I nor II follow.The least possible Venn diagram for the given statements is as below: Conclusions: (1) Some data is information → False → (As all data is raw and no...

1 Answers 1 views
In the question, a statement is given followed by two courses of action numbered I and II. You have to take the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given course of action is to be taken logically Statements: Half of the students in a class were caught cheating in the final examination. Course of action: I: The guilty should be punished and asked to re-write the exam with a new question paper. II: That particular test should be cancelled.?

Option 2 : Only I followsStatements: Half of the students in a class were caught cheating in the final examination. Course of action: I: The guilty should be punished and asked to re-write...

1 Answers 1 views
In the question given below, a statement is given, followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusion, if any follows from the given statement. Statement: The company X has decided to increase the price of its cars by 10%. Conclusions: I. Other companies will change the price of their cars. II. Other companies will not change the price of their cars.?

Option 3 : Either I or II followsThe logic followed is: The statement talks about the company X which has decided to increase the price of its car by 10%. conclusion I...

1 Answers 1 views
In the question below are given two statements followed by two conclusion. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: All cars are tyres. Some clutchs are tyres. Conclusions: I. Some cars are clutchs. II. Some clutchs are cars.?

Option 4 : If neither conclusion I nor II followsThe least possible Venn diagram for the given statements is as below, Conclusions: I. Some cars are clutchs → False (There is no direct relation...

1 Answers 1 views
 In each question below are given three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the two/three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statement: Some mobiles are laptops. No laptop is computer. All phones are computer. Conclusion: I. At least some mobiles are computer. II. At least some phone are laptops.?

Option 3 : If neither conclusion I nor II follows.The least possible venn diagram for the above statements is as follows: [ alt="F1 Kanchan Madhuri 14.06.2021 D8" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/21/06/F1_Kanchan_Madhuri_14.06.2021_D8.png" style="width: 323px; height:...

1 Answers 1 views
In the question, one statement is given, followed by two courses of action, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given course of actions, if any, follows from the given statement. Statement: A large number of people in area A of the city are diagnosed with COVID-19. Course of Actions: I : The city municipal authority should take immediate steps to carry out extensive testing of people in area A. II : The people in the area should be advised to take necessary precautionary steps to avoid COVID-19.?

Option 4 : Both I and II followThe given statement: A large number of people in area A of the city are diagnosed with COVID-19. As a large number of people in...

1 Answers 1 views
In question given below, there are two statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some Lawyers are girls. All girls are fair. Conclusions: I. Some girls are lawyers. II. No fair is girl. ?

Option 4 : Only conclusion I followsThe least possible Venn diagram is: Conclusions: I. Some girls are lawyers → True (As, some lawyers are girls, some girls are lawyers will be true.) II. No...

1 Answers 1 views
X