- Only conclusion l follows
- Only conclusion II follows
- Both I and Il follow
- Neither I nor II follows
1 Answers
Call
Option 2 : Only conclusion II follows
Given statement:
Company ABC has marketed the product with the following slogan: "Go ahead; purchase it if the price and quality are your considerations".
According to the given information,
Conclusion I → This conclusion does not follow, because this conclusion doesn’t match with the company's slogan. There is no clue about the high price in the statement.
Conclusion II → This conclusion is follows, because this conclusion is matched with company's slogan. According to the statement, In the Company ABC have a good quality product at the cheap price.
Hence, “Only conclusion II follows".
0
like
0 dislike
Talk Doctor Online in Bissoy App
In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements. Statements:
All Toms are Jerrys.
Some Jerrys are Mickeys.
Conclusions:
I. Some Toms are Mickeys.
II. Some Toms are not Mickeys.
III. Some Jerrys are Toms.?
Option 4 : Only conclusion III follows.The least possible Venn diagram for the given statement is as follows : Conditions of Either-or case: 1. Individually both the conclusions should be false. 2. One...
1 Answers 1 views
In the question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements.
Statement:
After this amendment to the Constitution, no child below the age of 14 years shall be employed in any factory or mine or in any other hazardous employment.
Conclusion:
I. Before this amendment, children below the age of 14 years were employed to work in factories or mines.
II. Employers now have to comply with this constitutional amendment.?
Option 2 : Both conclusion I and II follow.The logic follows here is: Statement: After this amendment to the Constitution, no child below the age of 14 years shall be employed in...
1 Answers 1 views
In the question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements.
Statement:
For admission to MA (Social Work) course, the condition of prior experience in social work may be relaxed by the Admission Committee to the best candidates.
Conclusion:
I. Some students of MA (Social Work) will have prior experience of social work.
II. Some MA (Social Work) students will not have prior experience in social work.?
Option 2 : Conclusion I and Conclusion II both follow.Concept: We have to examine the given statement and then analyse the conclusions to judge if the given conclusions are following the...
1 Answers 1 views
Two statement are given below, followed by three conclusions, I, II and III. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance with commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.
Statement 1: Every man should have his identity card with him
Statement 2: That card should mention his blood group, complete address and telephone number for contact, in case of emergencies.
Conclusion I: Blood CANNOT be transfused until its group is mentioned in the card.
Conclusion II: No one is supposed to forget his phone number under any circumstances
Conclusion III: The police needs this information if the injury is fatal.?
Option 3 : Only conclusion III followsGiven: Statement 1: Every man should have his identity card with him Statement 2: That card should mention his blood group, complete address and telephone number for contact,...
1 Answers 1 views
A statement is given below, followed by two arguments, 1 and 2. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance with commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is strong and supports the given statements.
Statement: Should taxes be abolished in a developing country like India
Arguments 1: No, taxes are a good source of Income for the government to take steps for the development of the country.
Arguments 2. Yes, these taxes are NOT used for the goodwill of the nation.?
Option 1 : Only 1 argument is strongGiven statement: Should taxes be abolished in a developing country like India? The logic followed is: According to the given information, Arguments 1 1 This is implicit because if...
1 Answers 1 views
Here, a statement is followed by four conclusions numbered I, II, III and IV. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.
Statements:
Some Jokers are man.
No man is cycle.
Conclusions:
(I) No Joker is cycle.
(II) No man is Joker.
(III) Some Jokers are cycles.
(IV) Some men are Jokers.?
Option 2 : Only IV followsThe Venn diagram is given below:- [ alt="SYLL" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/22/01/SYLL.png" style=" width: 347px; height: 372px;">
1 Answers 1 views
In the question two statements are given, followed by three conclusions, I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, supports the given statements.
Statement 1: All the students in a class are bright.
Statement 2: X is NOT bright.
Conclusion I: Some students are NOT bright.
Conclusion II: X must work hard.
Conclusion III: X is NOT a student of that class.?
Option 3 : Only conclusion III follows Statement 1: All the students in a class are bright. Statement 2: X is NOT bright. [ alt="F4 Prashant Madhuri 24.02.2022 D17" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/22/02/F4_Prashant_Madhuri_24.02.2022_D17.png" style="width: 167px; height: 92px;"> Conclusion I: Some...
1 Answers 1 views
In the question, one statement is given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.
Statement: Domestic demand has been increasing faster than the production of wheat.
Conclusion I: Domestic demand must be reduced.
Conclusion II: We should import wheat.?
Option 2 : Only conclusion II followsStatement: Domestic demand has been increasing faster than the production of wheat. Conclusion I: Domestic demand must be reduced - False (This is not the permanent solution, As,...
1 Answers 1 views
In the question one statement is given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.
Statement : 55% of Manisha's office colleagues went to watch the movie.
Conclusion I : Manisha went to watch the movie.
Conclusion II : Manisha did not go to watch the movie.?
Option 4 : Either I or II followsStatement: 55% of Manisha's office colleagues went to watch the movie. Here in the statement, it is not mentioned if Manisha went to watch the...
1 Answers 1 views
A Statement followed by Conclusion-I and Conclusion-II is given below. You have to take the Statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read all conclusions and then decide which of the given Conclusion(s) logically follows/follows from the statement, disregarding the commonly known facts.
Statement: Some radios are mobiles. All mobiles are computers. Some computers are watches.
Conclusion I: Certainly some radios are watches.
Conclusion II: Certainly some mobiles are watches.
Which one of the following is correct?
Option 4 : Neither Conclusion-I nor Conclusion - IIThe least possible logical Venn diagram according to given statements is, Shortcut Trick In these types of questions, we need to eliminate conclusions. If the...
1 Answers 1 views