Two statement are given below, followed by three conclusions, I, II and III. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance with commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement 1: Every man should have his identity card with him Statement 2: That card should mention his blood group, complete address and telephone number for contact, in case of emergencies. Conclusion I: Blood CANNOT be transfused until its group is mentioned in the card. Conclusion II: No one is supposed to forget his phone number under any circumstances Conclusion III: The police needs this information if the injury is fatal.?

LohaHridoy
  1. Only conclusion I follows
  2. Only conclusion Il follows
  3. Only conclusion III follows
  4. None of them follows

0 like 0 dislike
1 views
Share with your friends

1 Answers

AhmedNazir

Call

Option 3 : Only conclusion III follows

Given:

Statement 1: Every man should have his identity card with him
Statement 2: That card should mention his blood group, complete address and telephone number for contact, in case of emergencies.

According to the given information,

Conclusion I → This conclusion is not followed because an identity card is not the only source to know the blood group of any person.

Conclusion II → This conclusion is not followed because this conclusion is don’t match with statements.

Conclusion III → This conclusion follows, because if any need emergency the important information is available on the identity card.

Hence, “Only conclusion III follows".
0 like 0 dislike
1 views
Talk Doctor Online in Bissoy App
In the question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements. Statement: After this amendment to the Constitution, no child below the age of 14 years shall be employed in any factory or mine or in any other hazardous employment. Conclusion: I. Before this amendment, children below the age of 14 years were employed to work in factories or mines. II. Employers now have to comply with this constitutional amendment.?

Option 2 : Both conclusion I and II follow.The logic follows here is: Statement: After this amendment to the Constitution, no child below the age of 14 years shall be employed in...

1 Answers 1 views
A statement is given below, followed by two conclusions- I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance with commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements Statement: Company ABC has marketed the product with the following slogan: "Go ahead; purchase it if the price and quality are your considerations". Conclusion I: The price of the product must be high. Conclusion II: The product must be of a good quality.?

Option 2 : Only conclusion II followsGiven statement: Company ABC has marketed the product with the following slogan: "Go ahead; purchase it if the price and quality are your considerations". According to...

1 Answers 1 views
Here, a statement is followed by four conclusions numbered I, II, III and IV. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.  Statements:  Some Jokers are man. No man is cycle. Conclusions: (I) No Joker is cycle. (II) No man is Joker. (III) Some Jokers are cycles. (IV) Some men are Jokers.?

Option 2 : Only IV followsThe Venn diagram is given below:-  [ alt="SYLL" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/22/01/SYLL.png" style=" width: 347px; height: 372px;">

1 Answers 1 views
Two statements are given, followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All statements are answers. Some statements are questions. Conclusions: I. No question is a statement. II. Some answers are statements. III. Some questions are statements.?

Option 2 : Only conclusions II and III followStatements: All statements are answers. Some statements are questions. The least possible diagram for the given statements is as follows [ alt="F1 Puja T Shraddha 8-02-2022...

1 Answers 1 views
In the question two statements are given, followed by three conclusions, I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, supports the given statements. Statement 1: All the students in a class are bright. Statement 2: X is NOT bright. Conclusion I: Some students are NOT bright. Conclusion II: X must work hard. Conclusion III: X is NOT a student of that class.?

Option 3 : Only conclusion III follows Statement 1: All the students in a class are bright. Statement 2: X is NOT bright. [ alt="F4 Prashant Madhuri 24.02.2022 D17" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/22/02/F4_Prashant_Madhuri_24.02.2022_D17.png" style="width: 167px; height: 92px;"> Conclusion I: Some...

1 Answers 1 views
In the question, one statement is given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement: Domestic demand has been increasing faster than the production of wheat. Conclusion I: Domestic demand must be reduced. Conclusion II: We should import wheat.?

Option 2 : Only conclusion II followsStatement: Domestic demand has been increasing faster than the production of wheat. Conclusion I: Domestic demand must be reduced - False (This is not the permanent solution, As,...

1 Answers 1 views
In the question one statement is given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement : 55% of Manisha's office colleagues went to watch the movie. Conclusion I : Manisha went to watch the movie. Conclusion II : Manisha did not go to watch the movie.?

Option 4 : Either I or II followsStatement: 55% of Manisha's office colleagues went to watch the movie. Here in the statement, it is not mentioned if Manisha went to watch the...

1 Answers 1 views
A Statement followed by Conclusion-I and Conclusion-II is given below. You have to take the Statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read all conclusions and then decide which of the given Conclusion(s) logically follows/follows from the statement, disregarding the commonly known facts. Statement: Some radios are mobiles. All mobiles are computers. Some computers are watches. Conclusion I: Certainly some radios are watches. Conclusion II: Certainly some mobiles are watches. Which one of the following is correct?

Option 4 : Neither Conclusion-I nor Conclusion - IIThe least possible logical Venn diagram according to given statements is,  Shortcut Trick  In these types of questions, we need to eliminate conclusions. If the...

1 Answers 1 views
You are given three statements and three conclusions. Choose the comment about conclusion from the given options below: Given below are three statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Consider the statement and the following conclusions and decide which of the conclusion(s) follow(s). Statement: I No cat is a lion. II. Some horses are lions. III. All cats are cows. Conclusions: I. Some cows are lions. II. Some horses are cats. III. No lion is a cow.?

Option 4 : Either I or III followThe least possible Venn diagram will be as follows:  Complementary pair: 1) When both the elements of conclusions are the same. 2) When both the conclusions...

1 Answers 1 views
Three statements are given followed by four conclusions numbered I, II, III and IV. Assuming that the given information is true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts, state which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements. Statement: All boxes are tables. All tables are mats. All mats are chairs. Conclusion: I. Some chairs are boxes. II. All boxes are chairs. III. Some mats are boxes. IV. All tables are Boxes.?

Option 3 : Only conclusions I, II and III follow.The least possible Venn diagram for the given statements is as follows: [ alt="F1 Pooja.S 14-10-21 Savita D40" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/21/10/F1_Pooja.S_14-10-21_Savita_D40.png" style="width: 226px; height:...

1 Answers 1 views
X