. . . . . . . . of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 prescribes that the acceptance must be made in a reasonable manner. If the proposer has prescribed a manner of acceptance, the acceptance must be made in that manner, if not so made, there is a contract only if the proposer 'accepts the acceptance'

Assertion (A): Where any special or local law prescribes for any suit appeal or application a period of limitation different from period prescribed by the Schedule, the provisions of Section 3 of Limitation Act, 1963 shall apply as if such period were the period prescribed by the schedule.
Reason (R): Where a Special Law prescribes a period of limitation for filing appeal but there is no provision therefore under Limitation Act, 1963, the period of limitation provided under the Special Law must be treated to be different from that under the Limitation Act.

A

Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is correct explanation of (A)

B

Both (A) and (R) are true but (R) is not correct explanation of (A)

C

(A) is true but (R) is false

D

(A) is false but (R) is true

As per the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the communication of an acceptance is complete:
1. As against the acceptor when it comes to the knowledge of the proposer.
2. As against the proposer when it is put in a course of transmission to him so as to be out of the power of the acceptor.
Based on the above two propositions, decide:

A

Only (1) is correct

B

Only (2) is correct

C

Both (1) and (2) are correct

D

None of the above two propositions is correct

Consider the following statements in respect of acceptance:
1. In case of telephonic conversation, the contract is complete when the acceptor speaks the words of acceptance.
2. Conditional or qualified acceptance is also an acceptance.
3. Acceptance should be in the usual prescribed manner.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

A

1 and 2

B

2 and 3

C

3 only

D

1 and 3

If the proposer prescribes the mode & manner of acceptance, the acceptance

A

Can be in any manner & mode

B

Should be in the manner & mode prescribed

C

Can be in any reasonable mode & manner

D

All the above

Which of the following are the drawbacks of acceptance sampling? (i) Acceptance sampling is less expensive. (ii) Acceptance sampling has the risk of accepting good lots and rejecting bad lots. (iii) Acceptance sampling requires planning and documentation of the acceptance-sampling procedure whereas 100% inspection does not. (iv) Acceptance sampling requires less manpower.

A

i, ii, iii, iv

B

ii, iii, iv

C

ii, iii

D

i, ii, iv

Read Assertion (A) and Reason (R) and give the correct answer by using the given below:
Assertion (A): A proposal may be revoked at any time before the communication of its acceptance is complete as against the proposer, But not afterwards.
Reason (R): Section 5 of the Indian contract Act 1872, deals with the revocation of proposals and acceptances.

A

Both (A) and (R) are correct, but (R) is not related to (A)

B

(A) is correct, but (R) is wrong

C

(A) is wrong, but (R) is correct

D

Both (A) and (R) are correct, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)

Following is/are essentialt(s) of valid contract as per Indian Contract Act, 1872.
(1) Parties to contract should have capacity to contract.
(2) Parties to contract should have legal mind.
(3) Parties to contract should be intelligent.
(4) Invitation to offer should be accepted.
Find correct answer:

A

Only (1) and (4) are correct

B

Only (1) is correct

C

All of above are correct

D

Only (2) is correct

E

None of these

Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives.
Doing an internship at the University of Lille in France, I almost always found myself stuck whenever I had to speak to non-Indians about India or on anything'Indian'. This was more because of the subtle differences in the way the French understood India in comparison to what I thought was 'Indian'. For instance, when I,or any Indian for that matter, say 'Hindi' is an Indian language, what it means is that it is one of the languages widely spoken in India. This need not be similar tothe understanding that the French would have when they hear of 'Hindi' as an Indian language. Because for them Hindi then becomes the only language spoken inIndia. This is a natural inference that the French, Germans, Italians and many other European nationals would tend to make, because that is generally how it is intheir own respective countries. The risk of such inappropriate generalisations made about 'Indian' is not restricted to language alone but also for India's landscape,cuisine, movies, music, climate, economic development and even political ideologies. The magnitude of diversity of one European country can be easily compared tothat of one of the Indian State, isn't it? Can they imagine that India is one country whose diversity can be equated to that of the entire European continent? Theonus is upon us to go ahead and clarify the nuances in 'Indianness' while we converse. But why should one do so? How does it even matter to clarify? Why do some French people think that Hindi is the only Indian language?

A

Because that is the way in most European countries

B

That is what is being taught to them

C

They know India is also called as Hindustan so people there must speak only Hindi

D

As most Indians they meet speak Hindi

The main reason why a life insurance proposal form often asks for the proposer's height is to enable a reasonable comparison with the proposer’s

A

Age

B

Gender

C

Occupation

D

Weight

Consider the following statements:
The communication of an acceptance is complete
1. As against the acceptor when it comes to the knowledge of the proposer.
2. As against the proposer, when it is put in a course of transmission to him, so as to be out of the power of the acceptor.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

A

1 only

B

2 only

C

Both 1 and 2

D

Neither 1 nor 2