Get Advice on Live Video Call
Earn $ Cash $ with
consultations on Bissoy App

Assertion (A): Where any special or local law prescribes for any suit appeal or application a period of limitation different from period prescribed by the Schedule, the provisions of Section 3 of Limitation Act, 1963 shall apply as if such period were the period prescribed by the schedule.<br>Reason (R): Where a Special Law prescribes a period of limitation for filing appeal but there is no provision therefore under Limitation Act, 1963, the period of limitation provided under the Special Law must be treated to be different from that under the Limitation Act.

Correct Answer: Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is correct explanation of (A)

To constitute a matter of res judicata which of the following conditions must concur?
1. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit or issue must be the same matter which was directly and substantially in issue either actually (section 11, explanation III) or constructively (section 11, explanation IV) in the former suit
2. The former suit must have been a suit between the same parties under whom they or any of them claim. Explanation VI of Section 11 must be read with this condition
3. The parties as aforesaid must have litigated under the same title in the former suit
4. The court which decided the former suit must have been a court competent to try the subsequent suit of the suit in which such issue has been subsequently raised. Explanation II of section 11 is to be read with condition
5. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit must have been heard and finally decided by the court in the first suit. Explanation V of section 11 is to be read with this condition

Which provision of the Act stipulates for the purpose of determining any period of limitation prescribed for any suit, appeal or application by any special or local law, the provisions contained in Section 4 to 24 shall apply only insofar as, and to the extent to which, they are not expressly excluded by such special or local law?

Assertion (A): Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 empowers the Court to admit a suit after the prescribed period if the plaintiff satisfies the Court that he had sufficient cause for not instituting the suit.
Reason (R): Even an appeal may be admitted after the prescribed period if the appellant shows sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal within the prescribed period.

Which section of the Limitation Act prescribes that in computing the period of limitation for any suit, appeal or application, for leave to appeal or for revision or for review of a judgment, the day on which the judgment complained of was pronounced and the time requisite for obtaining a copy of the decree, sentence or order appealed from or sought to be revised or reviewed shall be excluded:

Which section of the Limitation Act prescribes that in computing the period of limitation any suit, appeal or application, for leave to appeal or for revision or for review of a judgment the day on which the judgment complained of was pronounced and the time requisite obtaining a copy of the decree, sentence or order appealed from or sought to be revised reviewed shall be excluded:

Under Section 12, Limitation Act, 1963 in computing the period of limitation for any suit, appeal or application, the day from which such period is to be reckoned, shall be . . . . . . . . .

Where a person entitled to institute a suit or make an application for the execution of a decree is, at the time from which the prescribed period is to be reckoned, a person with disability, he may institute the suit or make the application within the same period after the disability has ceased, as would otherwise have been allowed from the time specified therefore in the third column of the schedule, instead of 'a person with disability', the Act specifies three types of disabilities. Which of the following is not stated in the Act?

In a suit filed by the plaintiff, the defendant in his written statement has taken the objection of non-impleadment of necessary party. Despite such objection the plaintiff continued the suit and the suit finally was decreed. At the first appellate stage, the plaintiff withdraws the suit with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action and subsequently filed a fresh suit. The period spent by the plaintiff in the earlier suit, under section 14 of Limitation Act is

Which of the following statements are true/false?
1. The Societies Registration Act, 1860 shall not apply to any registered Trade Union, and the registration of any such Trade Union under any such Act shall be void.
2. Trade Unions may be temporary or permanent.
3. Workmen means all persons employed in trade or industry whether or not in the employment of the employer with whom the trade dispute arises.
4. Every registered Trade Union shall be a body corporate by the name under which it is registered, and shall have perpetual succession and a common seal with power to acquire and hold both movable and immovable property and to contract, and shall by the said name sue and be sued.

Any suit for which no period of Limitation is provided elsewhere in Limitation Act 1963 the period for filing a suit is