- Only argument I is strong
- Only argument II is strong
- Either I or II is strong
- Neither I nor II is strong
- Both I and II are strong
1 Answers
Call
Talk Doctor Online in Bissoy App
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by four arguments I, II, III and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should the rule of wearing helmet for both driver and pillion rider while driving a motor bike be enforced strictly Arguments : I. Yes. It is a rule and rules should be followed strictly by all. II. No. Each individual knows how to protect his own life and it should be left to his discretion. III. No. It does not ensure safety as only the head is protected and rest of the body is not. IV. Yes. It is a necessity as head, being the most sensitive organ, is protected by the helmet.?
Answer: Option 3 Clearly, the rule has been devised for the safety of two-wheeler riders, as majority of two wheeler accidents result in direct fall of the rider, leading to...
1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should there be only one rate of interest for term deposits of varying durations in banks Arguments : I. No, People will refrain from keeping money for longer duration resulting into reduction of liquidity level of banks. II. Yes. This will be much simple for the common people and they may be encouraged to keep more money in banks.?
Answer: Option 1 The proposed scheme would discourage people from keeping deposit for longer durations and not draw in more funds. So, only argument I holds.
1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should young entrepreneurs be encouraged Arguments : I. Yes. They will help in industrial development of the country. II. Yes. They will reduce the burden on employment market.?
Answer: Option 5 Clearly, encouraging the young entrepreneurs will open up the field for the establishment of new industries. Thus, it shall help in industrial development and not only employ...
1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should government jobs in rural areas have more incentives Arguments : I. Yes. Incentives are essential for attracting government servants there. II. No. Rural areas are already cheaper, healthier and less complex than big cities. So Why offer extra incentives!?
Answer: Option 1 Clearly, government jobs in rural areas are underlined with several difficulties. In lieu of these, extra incentives are needed. So, only argument I holds strong.
1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should there be only one rate of interest for term deposits of varying durations in banks Arguments : I. No. People will refrain from keeping money for longer duration resulting into reduction of liquidity level of banks. II. Yes. This will be much simple for the common people and they may be encouraged to keep more money in banks.?
Answer: Option 1 Clearly, the proposed scheme would discourage people from keeping deposits for longer durations (the rate of interest being the same for short durations) and not draw in...
1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should the educated unemployed youth be paid "unemployment allowance" by the Government Arguments : I. Yes. It will provide them some monetary help to either seek employment or to kick-start some 'self-employment' venture. II. No. It will dampen their urge to do something to earn their livelihood and thus promote idleness among the unemployed youth.?
Answer: Option 5 Young people, who do not get employment due to the large number of applicants in all fields, must surely be given allowance so that they can support...
1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by four arguments I, II, III and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should people with educational qualification higher than the optimum requirements be debarred from seeking jobs Arguments : I. No. It will further aggravate the problem of educated unemployment. II. Yes. It creates complexes among employees and affects the work adversely. III. No. This goes against the basic rights of the individuals. IV. Yes. This will increase productivity.?
Answer: Option 4 The issue discussed in the statement is nowhere related to increase in unemployment, as the number of vacancies filled in will remain the same. Also, in a...
1 Answers 3 views
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments I, II and III . You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should the system of Lok Adalats and mobile courts be encouraged in India Arguments : I. Yes. It helps to grant speedy justice to the masses. II. Yes. The dispensing of minor cases at this level would reduce the burden on the higher courts. III. No. These courts are usually partial in justice.?
Answer: Option 1 Courts are meant to judge impartially. So, argument III is vague. The system of local courts shall speed up justice by providing easy approach and simplified procedures,...
1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by four arguments I, II, III and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should all those who are convicted for heinous crimes like murder or rape, beyond all reasonable doubts be given capital punishment or death penalty Arguments : I. No. The death penalty should be given only in very rare and exceptional cases. II. Yes. This is the only way to punish such people who take others' lives or indulge in inhuman activities. III. Yes. Such severe punishments only will make people refrain from such heinous acts and the society will be safer. IV. No. Those who are repentant for the crime they committed should be given a chance to improve and lead a normal life.?
Answer: Option 3 Clearly, a person committing a heinous crime like murder or rape should be so punished as to set an example for others not to attempt such acts...
1 Answers 1 views