Consider the following assertions. 1. Synthetic apirori judgment is the standard of knowledge. 2. Synthetic a posteriori judgement is the standard of knowledge. 3. Analytic apriori judgement is the standard of knowledge. 4. Analytic a posteriori judgement is the standard of knowledge. Select the correct answer:

Only 1 is correct

Only 2 is correct

1 and 4 are correct

Only 3 is correct

Consider the following assertions
1. Synthetic apriori judgement is the standard of knowledge
2. Synthetic a posteriori judgement is the standard of knowledge.
3. Analytic apriori judgement is the standard of knowledge.
4. Analytic a posteriori judgement is the standard of knowledge

Only 1 is correct

Only 1 and 4 are correct

Only 2 is correct

Only 3 is correct

Consider the following two statements in the light of Kant's view of knowledge.
Assertion (A) Universality necessity and novelty are the critieria of knowledge.
Reason (R) Synthetic apriori judgement fulfills all the required criteria of knowledge.

Both (A) and (R) are true and R is the correct explanation of (A)

Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)

(A) is true, but (R) is the false

(A) is false, but (R) is true

In which of the following situations previous judgment is relevant . . . . . . . .
1. A prosecutes B for adultery with C, A's wife. B denies that C is A's wife but the court convicts B of adultery. Afterwards, C is prosecuted for bigamy in marrying B during A's lifetime.
C says that she never was A's wife. Whether the judgment against B is relevant as against C.
2. A prosecutes B for stealing a cow from him. B is convicted. A, afterwards, sues C for the cow, which B had sold to him before his conviction.
As between A and C whether the judgment against B is relevant?
Choose the correct answer:

1 only

2 only

Both 1 and 2

Neither 1 nor 2

A five-judge bench of the Supreme Court passes judgment in a matter. In a later case before a high court, a party presents the Supreme Court judgment as a binding authority. The opposing party claims that the high court is not bound by the Supreme Court's judgment because relevant provisions of law were not brought to the notice of the Supreme Court in that case. Which of the following is most correct in this case?
Principle: Article 141 of the Constitution provides that the law declared by the Supreme Court is binding on all courts within the territory of India.

Since the relevant provisions of law were not brought to the notice of the Supreme Court, the five-judge bench's decision is not 'law' within the meaning of Article 141, and is not binding on the high court

The Supreme Court must expressly declare that its judgment is binding on all courts within the territory of India when passing judgment. In this case, the Supreme Court has not done so, and therefore, the decision of the five-judge bench is not binding on the high court

The High Court cannot ignore the decision of the Supreme Court on the ground that relevant provisions of law were not brought to its notice. Under Article 141, it is bound by the decision of the Supreme Court

Only those decisions that are passed by a larger bench than the five-judge bench would be hinding on the high court, since legitimate doubts have been raised about the propriety of the five-judge bench's decision

The decision of the five-judge bench, since it is in conflict with other decisions, must first be decided upon by a larger bench on the Supreme Court. Only after that would the decision be binding on all other courts under Article 141 of the Constitution