Get Advice on Live Video Call
Earn $ Cash $ with
consultations on Bissoy App

The plaintiff instructed his Banker to deposit excise duty on his behalf in the Govt. treasury and debit the current account of plaintiff. The Bank deposited the said sum in the treasury. Later the plaintiff came to know, that the said amount was embezzled by the Treasurer and the Accountant of the treasury and the amount was not credited in the name of the plaintiff. If the plaintiff brings an action against the State for damages then the State is:

Correct Answer: Liable to compensable as the function is a banking function which is not a sovereign function of the State

Re-arrange the following sentences into a meaningful paragraph. (A) comes into effect from today. The bank's savings account rate was 3.5 per cent during March 2003 to May 2011 for all savings bank account customers (B) The bank's decision comes two days ahead of RBI's monetary policy meet and is likely to trigger (C) with deposits of above Rs 1 crore, it said in a statement. The two-tier savings bank account interest rate (D) to 3.5 per cent, lowest in six years, a decision that will impact 90 per cent of its customers (E) The country's largest lender however will continue to pay 4 per cent interest on savings bank accounts (F) SBI today cut interest rate on savings bank account deposits up to Rs 1 crore by 0.5 per cent (G) rate war among peers. SBI's savings bank account base is of around Rs 9 lakh crore.

'A' gave some cash and cheques to his friend 'B' who was an employee of the State Bank of India, to deposit the same in the Bank in the account of 'A'. 'B' misappropriated the amount. If 'A', 'B' misappropriated the amount. If 'A' sues the Bank for damages, then the Bank is:

Ram deposited a certain sum of money in a company at 12% per annum simple interest for 4 years and deposited equal amounts in fixed deposit in a bank for 5 years at 15% per annum simple interest. If the difference in the interest from two sources is Rs. 1350 then the sum deposited in each case is = ?

The following questions are based on the information given below In a school of 4000 students 3000 know English, 2000 know French and 5000 know Hindi, 1500 know French and English, 300 know French and Hindi, 200 know English and Hindi and 50 know all the three languages. How many do not know any of the three languages?

The following questions are based on the information given below In a school of 4000 students 3000 know English, 2000 know French and 5000 know Hindi, 1500 know French and English, 300 know French and Hindi, 200 know English and Hindi and 50 know all the three languages. How many know only two languages?

The following questions are based on the information given below In a school of 4000 students 3000 know English, 2000 know French and 5000 know Hindi, 1500 know French and English, 300 know French and Hindi, 200 know English and Hindi and 50 know all the three languages. How many know atleast one language?

Plaintiff was the chairperson of the town meeting. The defendant having been very vociferous, a motion was made and carried out by majority that the defendant be turned out. The defendant said he would rather pull out the plaintiff than he turned out. He advanced menacingly towards the plaintiff with clinched fists, but his advance was prevented by a warden. Decide appropriate civil action against the defendant for his action against the plaintiff.

A, a bank officer, got compulsorily retired in 2014. Since the bank authorities did not release the leave encashment in his favour, he filed writ petition WP 2001 (W) of 2017 in Ranchi High Court for the same and also for the interest on the unpaid amount. The writ petition was disposed of by a learned Single Judge in December 2018 directing the bank to release the privileged leave encashment benefits to the petitioner to the extent he was entitled to in accordance with law within a certain period. The prayer for interest was not specifically denied by the court. The bank filed an appeal against the order. The Division Bench of Ranchi High Court in February, 2019 declined to admit the appeal. The bank authorities released the leave encashment in favour of the petitioner. However, A files a writ petition again for a direction to the bank to disburse interest to A at the rate of 18% per annum on leave encashment released by the bank. This petition is covered under which of the following?

One X wrote defamatory letter against Y, a copy of which he sent to the Chairman of the Municipal Committee and other for publication in a local newspaper in which it was duly published. Y sued X and the editor, publisher and management of the newspaper for damages. Subsequently, a sum of Rs. 5,000 was paid by the newspaper by way of damages to Y and an apology was also published in the newspaper. Thereupon Y withdrew his action against the newspaper but not against X. X pleads that the release of other joint tort-feasors amounted to his release also

On 1st January, 2010, an amount is deposited by the plaintiff with the defendant, not being a loan. On 1st January, 2012, demand is made by the plaintiff for repayment of the deposit. On 1st January, 2014, suit for recovery is filed for the amount of deposit. Is this suit within limitation?