Get Advice on Live Video Call
Earn $ Cash $ with
consultations on Bissoy App

In which of the following case, the court has held that limitation period as provided in the Limitation Act, 1963 would extend seven years by virtue of Section 39 of the Limitation Act, since a period of 30 years. Thus making Limitation period for redemption of Mortgage as 37 years

Correct Answer: Santa Singh v. Prakash Singh

Assertion (A): Where any special or local law prescribes for any suit appeal or application a period of limitation different from period prescribed by the Schedule, the provisions of Section 3 of Limitation Act, 1963 shall apply as if such period were the period prescribed by the schedule.
Reason (R): Where a Special Law prescribes a period of limitation for filing appeal but there is no provision therefore under Limitation Act, 1963, the period of limitation provided under the Special Law must be treated to be different from that under the Limitation Act.

Section 58 enumerates some classes mortgages:
(1) Simple mortgage
(2) Mortgage by conditional sale
(3) Usufructuary mortgage
(4) English mortgage
(5) Equitable mortgage
(6) Anomalous mortgage

A mortgage which is not a simple mortgage, a mortgage by conditional sale, an Usufructuary mortgage, an English mortgage or a mortgage by deposit of title deeds is called . . . . . . . .

When a mortgagee acquires a portion of equity of redemption, the mortgage is not extinguished completely. There can be only a pro tanto extinguishment of the mortgage right to the extent of the mortgagee acquiring the mortgagor's interest and so far as the other sharer of the equity of redemption is concerned, the mortgagee will subsist. This was held in case of:

In which of the following cases the Calcutta High Court held that "Though Limitation of 1 year as provided in Contempt of Courts Act, in fit case provisions of section 5 and 17 of Limitation Act can be applied by virtue of section 29(2)of Limitation Act"?

Mortgagor binds himself to repay the mortgage money on certain date and transfer mortgage property absolutely to mortgagee with a condition that upon repayment of mortgage money, the mortgage will re-transfer it to mortgagor. This type of mortgage is known as:

Which of the following statements are correct? Answer by using the code given below:
1. Persons in Govt/Judicial service need not resign to participate in District judge selection process held in "Vijay Kumar Misra and another v. High Court of Judicature at Patna" by the Supreme Court of India
2. The Supreme Court of India held in S. Kazi v. Muslim Education Society that " All Tribunals are not necessary parties to the proceedings where legality of its orders challenged"
3. The Supreme Court of India observed in Cardanumom Marketing Corporation and others v. State of Kerala and others that Social Security to the legal profession becomes an essential part of legal system
4. The Supreme Court of India held in 'Union of India v. Rajasthan High Court and others that High Court judges are exempted from Airport frisking.

Legal subrogation occur in following ways:
(1) a puisne mortgagee redeeming a prior mortgage.
(2) a co-mortgagor's surety redeeming the mortgage.
(3) mortgagor's surety redeeming.
(4) a purchaser of the equity of redemption redeeming a mortgage.

A seven member bench of the Supreme Court unanimously struck down clauses 2(d) of Article 323A and clause 3(d) of Article 323B of the Constitution relating to tribunals which excluded the jurisdiction of High Court and Supreme Court. The court held that power of judicial review over legislative action is vested in the High Court under Article 226 and in the Supreme Court under Article 32. This is an integral part of the basic structure of the constitution. Name the case:

In computing the period of limitation for any suit the time during which the plaintiff has been prosecuting with due diligence another civil proceedings, whether in a court of first instance or of appeal or revision, against the defendant shall be excluded where the proceeding relates to the same matter in issue and is prosecuted in good faith in a court which from the defect of jurisdiction is unable to entertain it. Exclusion of such period has been laid down in section . . . . . . . . . of the Limitation Act, 1963.