Under Indian Contract Act, 1872, if the time is essence of a contract and the promisor fails to perform the contract by the specified time, the contract:

If the time of performance of the contract is the essence of the contract and the promisor fails to perform the contract by the specified time-

A

The contract becomes void and is unenforceable

B

The contract remains valid and is enforceable

C

The contract becomes voidable at the instance of the promisee

D

The contract though valid becomes unenforceable

Indian Contract Act:- In a contract in which time is not essence of the contract, the failure to perform the contract before specified time-

A

Contract win become void

B

The Promisee is entitled to compensation from the promisor for any loss occasioned to him by such failure

C

Contract will become voidable at the option of the promisor

D

Contract will become voidable at the option of the promisee

Consider the following statements:
Where the tender of performance is rejected by the other party,
1. the promisor has to still perform the contract but can claim damages.
2. the promisor is excused from further performance and is entitled to sue the promisee for breach of contract.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

A

1 only

B

2 only

C

Both 1 and 2

D

Neither 1 nor 2

If the time is not the essence of the contract the failure to perform the contract by the specified time makes the contract

A

Void

B

Voidable at the instance of the promisee

C

Remains valid but the promisee can claim compensation for the loss suffered by him by such failure

D

Remains valid & can be performed at any subsequent time without being liable for the loss suffered by the promisee

The contract of indemnity is valid under which of the following conditions?
1. there is a promise
2. to save another person from loss or make good the loss
3. which may be caused by the conduct of the promisor himself or by the conduct of any other person
4. the promisor undertakes to make good the loss
5. it covers indemnity for loss caused by human only

A

2, 3, and 5

B

1, 3, and 5

C

2, 3, and 4

D

1, 2, 3, 4 and 5

Following is/are essentialt(s) of valid contract as per Indian Contract Act, 1872.
(1) Parties to contract should have capacity to contract.
(2) Parties to contract should have legal mind.
(3) Parties to contract should be intelligent.
(4) Invitation to offer should be accepted.
Find correct answer:

A

Only (1) and (4) are correct

B

Only (1) is correct

C

All of above are correct

D

Only (2) is correct

E

None of these

Carefully read following statements:
1. According to Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, requirement is of two persons, whereas under Section 149 of Indian Penal Code, requirement is of five persons.
2. According to Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, common intention is required whereas under Section 149 Indian Penal Code, common object is required
3. Previous consent is required under Section 34 & 149 of Indian Penal Code
4. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 149 of Indian Penal Code constitutes a specific offence
Which of the above statements is true:

A

1 and 3

B

2 and 3

C

1 and 2

D

2 and 4

____________ is a measure of the probability that a measuring device will continue to perform within specified limits of error over a specified length of time under specified conditions.

A

Reliability

B

Repeatability

C

Accuracy

D

None of the mentioned

Nothing in section 23 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 shall be taken to exempt any barrister, pleader attorney or vakil from giving evidence of any matter of which he may be compelled to give evidence is provided by the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, under:

A

Section 127

B

Section 128

C

Section 129

D

Section 126

Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives.
Doing an internship at the University of Lille in France, I almost always found myself stuck whenever I had to speak to non-Indians about India or on anything'Indian'. This was more because of the subtle differences in the way the French understood India in comparison to what I thought was 'Indian'. For instance, when I,or any Indian for that matter, say 'Hindi' is an Indian language, what it means is that it is one of the languages widely spoken in India. This need not be similar tothe understanding that the French would have when they hear of 'Hindi' as an Indian language. Because for them Hindi then becomes the only language spoken inIndia. This is a natural inference that the French, Germans, Italians and many other European nationals would tend to make, because that is generally how it is intheir own respective countries. The risk of such inappropriate generalisations made about 'Indian' is not restricted to language alone but also for India's landscape,cuisine, movies, music, climate, economic development and even political ideologies. The magnitude of diversity of one European country can be easily compared tothat of one of the Indian State, isn't it? Can they imagine that India is one country whose diversity can be equated to that of the entire European continent? Theonus is upon us to go ahead and clarify the nuances in 'Indianness' while we converse. But why should one do so? How does it even matter to clarify? Why do some French people think that Hindi is the only Indian language?

A

Because that is the way in most European countries

B

That is what is being taught to them

C

They know India is also called as Hindustan so people there must speak only Hindi

D

As most Indians they meet speak Hindi