Proposition of the Law of Evidence is that<br>1. Proceedings of Legislature may be proved by the records certified by a member present in the proceedings.<br>2. Acts of the Central Government may be proved by the records of the department, certified by heads of the departments.<br>3. Acts of the state may be proved by the document purporting to be printed by the order of such Government.<br>4. Acts of the State Government may be proved by records of the department certified by the head of the corresponding department of the Central Government.

X had made some communications to his wife Y during their marriage under Section 122 of the Evidence Act, the correct proposition are:
1. X can be compelled to disclose such communications before the Court, if Y consents, in any proceeding.
2. X can be compelled to disclose such communication whether Y consents or not in any proceedings
3. Y can be compelled to disclose such communication whether X consents or not in a divorce proceedings between them
4. Y may be permitted by Court, if deems fit, to disclose any such communication in a criminal proceedings not between X and Y.

A

1, 3, 4 are not correct

B

1, 2, 3 are not correct

C

2, 3, 4 are not correct

D

2, 4 are not correct

Select the incorrect statements:
1. The Indian Evidence Act does not apply to arbitration proceedings.
2. The Indian Evidence Act does not apply to proceedings before a Commissioner appointed by the court for recording evidence
3. The Indian Evidence Act applies to affidavits presented to Courts
4. The Indian Evidence Act applies to judicial proceedings held before all kinds of military courts

A

2 and 3 are incorrect

B

2, 3 and 4 are incorrect

C

1 and 3 are incorrect

D

None of the above is incorrect

Which of the following statement/s about the Government of India Act, 1935 is/are not true?
1. In six of the provinces, the legislature was bicameral.
2. The Governor-General had the power to make permanent acts but not ordinances.
3. The residuary powers of legislation were vested In the Central Legislature.
4. Education as a subject was with Central Legislature.
5. Separate representation was provided only to the Muslim community.
Select the correct answer:

A

1, 2, 3 and 5

B

2, 4 and 5

C

2, 3, 4 and 5

D

1, 3, 4 and 5

Which Section of the Code of Civil Procedure declares that the court shall presume, upon the production of any document purporting to be a certified copy of a foreign judgment, that such judgment was pronounced by a court of competent jurisdiction, unless the contrary appears on the record, or is proved?

A

Section 13

B

Section 14

C

Section 19

D

Section 20

Which of the followingconditions has to be satisfied for the application of Section 14, Limitation Act, 1963?
1. Both the prior and subsequent proceeding are civil proceedings prosecuted by the same party
2. The prior proceedings had been prosecuted with due diligence and in good faith
3. The failure of the prior proceedings was due to defect of jurisdiction or cause of the nature
4. The earlier proceedings and later proceeding must relate to the same matter in issue
5. Both the proceedings are in Court

A

1, 3, 5

B

2, 4, 5

C

1, 5

D

All of these

A' document is said to be in the handwriting of 'A'. That document is produced from proper custody. If the document is purporting or proved to be-

A

Thirty

B

Fifteen

C

Twenty

D

Twelve years old, court may presume that is in 'A's handwriting

Choice the correct propositions:
1. Evidence of fingerprint expert is substantive evidence.
2. Evidence of fingerprint expert can be used only to corroborate some items of substantive evidence which are otherwise on record.
3. Evidence of fingerprint expert is not substantive evidence.
4. Evidence of fingerprint expert is admissible in all circumstances as expert evidence.

A

1 and 2 are true

B

2 and 3 are true

C

3 and 4 are true

D

2 and 4 are true

Directions : In each of the following questions a statement is given, followed by three conclusions. Give answer :

Statement : The State Government has unilaterally increased by five percent octroi on all commodities entering into the state without seeking approval of the Central Government.

Assumptions :
I. The State Government may be able to implement its decision.
II. The Central Government may agree to support the State Government's decision.
III. The State Government may be able to earn considerable amount through the additional octroi.

A

None is implicit

B

Only I and II are implicit

C

All are implicit

D

Only II and III are implicit

E

None of these

The Chairman of a big company visits one department on Monday of every week except for the Monday of third week of every month. When did he visit the Purchase department ? I. He visited Accounts department in the second week of September after having visited Purchase department on the earlier occasion. II. He had visited Purchase department immediately after visiting Stores department but before visiting Accounts department.

A

If the data in statement I alone are sufficient to answer the question

B

If the data in statement II alone are sufficient answer the question

C

If the data either in I or II alone are sufficient to answer the question;

D

If the data even in both the statements together are not sufficient to answer the question

Question : The Chairman of a big company visits one department on Monday of every week except for the Monday of third week of every month. When did he visit the Purchase department ?

Statements :
I. He visited Accounts department in the second week of September after having visited Purchase department on the earlier occasion.
II. He had visited Purchase department immediately after visiting Stores department but before visiting Accounts department.

A

I alone is sufficient while II alone is not sufficient

B

II alone is sufficient while I alone is not sufficient

C

Either I or II is sufficient

D

Neither I nor II is sufficient

E

Both I and II are sufficient