Get Advice on Live Video Call
Earn $ Cash $ with
consultations on Bissoy App

Choice the correct propositions:<br>1. Evidence of fingerprint expert is substantive evidence.<br>2. Evidence of fingerprint expert can be used only to corroborate some items of substantive evidence which are otherwise on record.<br>3. Evidence of fingerprint expert is not substantive evidence.<br>4. Evidence of fingerprint expert is admissible in all circumstances as expert evidence.

Correct Answer: 2 and 4 are true

Evidences are adduced by the parties to the suit about the 'character'. As per the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, which of the following is/are correct?
1. Evidence of the character in civil proceedings is irrelevant and inadmissible generally.
2. The character evidence is admissible if it affects the amount of damages which he ought to receive.
3. The character evidence is admissible in so far as such character appears from facts otherwise relevant.
Select the correct answer:

If a maker of dying declaration survives, his statement can be used under Indian Evidence Act, 1872:
1. As substantive evidence
2. To corroborate the testimony of maker if examined
3. To contradict the testimony of maker if examined
4. Cannot be used at all

In which of the following cases the Supreme Court held that First information Report (FIR) was not substantive evidence and could only be used to corroborate its maker?

In each of the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if theyseem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements.
Statements:
I. Some cups are plates.
II. All spoons are blue.
III. No plates are spoon.
Conclusions:
I. Some cups are not spoon.
II. Some plates are not blue.
III. Some cups are not blue.
IV. Some blue are not plates.

Choose the alternative where the third segment in the statement can be logically deduced using both the preceding two, but not just from one of them. I. All IIMs are in India. No BIMs are in India. No IIMs are BIMs II. All IIMs are in India. No BIMs are in India .No BIMs are IIMs III. Some IIMs are not in India. Some BIMs are not in India. Some IIMs are BIMs. IV. Some IIMs are not in India. Some BIMs are not in India. Some BIMs are IIMs.

Which of the following among item A and item B are correct?
The right of private defence extends, subject to Section 99, to the causing of death of the assailant or aggressor in the following circumstances:
Item A: For defence of body:
1. Against an act which reasonably causes the apprehension of an assault to outrage the modesty
2. Against an act which reasonably causes the apprehension that the assailant will kill his children living in another city
3. Against an act which reasonably causes the apprehension that grievous hurt would otherwise be the consequence
Item B: For defence of property:
1. While the trespasser is engaged in house breaking during day time.
2. Against a thief who reasonably causes the defender to believe that he would lose his property
3. Against a person who commits mischief under such circumstances as may reasonably cause apprehension that grievous Hurt would be a consequence
Select the correct answer:

In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem tobe at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements.
Statements:
I. All dens are spiral.
II. Some spirals are cards.
Conclusions:
I. Some spirals are not cards.
II. Some dens are not cards.
III. Some cards are den.

In each of the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions. Taking the given statements tobe true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion
logically follows the given statements.
Statements:
I. Some girls are clever.
II. All clever are hardworking.
Conclusions:
I. Some girls are not hardworking.
II. Some girls are hardworking.
III. Some hardworking are not girls.

The following question is based on the given data for an examination. A. Candidates appeared 10500 B. Passed in all the five subjects 5685 C. Passed in three subjects only 1498 D. Passed in two subjects only 1250 E. Passed in one subject only 835 F. Failed in English only 78 G. Failed in Maths only 275 H. Failed in Physics only 149 I. Failed in Chemistry only 147 J. Failed in Biology only 221 How many candidates passed in at least four subjects ?

Product choice is greatly affected by economic circumstances. All of the following would be among those circumstances EXCEPT ________.