Get Advice on Live Video Call
Earn $ Cash $ with
consultations on Bissoy App

Some good actor are not powerful athletes. Therefore, all professional wrestlers are good actor. All professional wrestlers are powerful athlets.<br>The syllogism involves the fallacy of

Correct Answer: Drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premise

All good athletes wants to win, and all athletes who want to win eat a well balanced diet : therefore, all athletes who do not eat a well balanced diet are bad athletes. Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the assumptions of the argument above?

Statements : All good athletes win. All good athletes eat well.

Conclusions :
I. All those who eat well are good athletes.
II. All those who win eat well.

$$\eqalign{ & {P_1} \to {\text{Some Spaniels are not good hunters}} \cr & {{\text{P}}_2} \to \underline {{\text{All Spaniels are gentle dogs}}} \cr & C \to \,\therefore \underline {{\text{No gentle dogs are good hunters}}} \cr} $$
This syllogism involves the fallacy of

Statements : No women teacher can play. Some women teachers are athletes.

Conclusions :
I. Male athletes can play.
II. Some athletes can play.

Which of the following phrases (i),(ii), and (iii) given below each sentenceshould replace the phrase printed in boldletters to make the sentence grammaticallycorrect? Choose the best option among thefive given alternatives that reflect the correctuse of phrase in the context of thegrammatically correct sentence. If thesentence is correct as it is, mark (E) i.e., "Nocorrection required" as the answer. My father told me that all the labor andeffort one puts in to the professional frontis meant to make life easier and thereforeany professional success coming at the cost ofpersonal happiness is pointless.
i. one puts at the professional front is meantto make life
ii. one puts onto the professional front ismeant to make life
iii. one who puts into the professional front ismeant to make life

No astrologers are scientists.
Some scientists are not magicians.
Some magicians are not astrologers.
This syllogism involves the fallacy of

Consider the syllogism below and identify the fallacy involved in it.
All pets are domestic animals.
No lions are domestic animals.
Therefore, some lions are not pets.

Given below are Assertion (A) and Reason (R), consider them and select the correct answer:
Assertion (A) A categorical syllogism commits a fallacy of four terms if more than three terms are used.
Reason (R) In a standard form of categorical syllogism, there are three and only three terms occuring twice each in the same meaning.

No poets are managers.
∴ Some artists are poets.
Some artists are managers.
This syllogism involves the fallacy of

In the following question, somestatements is followed by some conclusions,you have to take the given statements to betrue even if they seem to be at variance with
commonly known facts and then decide whichof the given logically follow. Choose thatconclusion as the answer. Statements:
Some roads are not good.
Some railways are good.
All airways are good.
Some roads are bad. Conclusions:
I. At least some bad are good.
II. No bad is good.