The adjective "first-order" distinguishes first-order logic from ___________ in which there are predicates having predicates or functions as arguments, or in which one or both of predicate quantifiers or function quantifiers are permitted.

The adjective “first-order” distinguishes first-order logic from ___________ in which there are predicates having predicates or functions as arguments, or in which one or both of predicate quantifiers or function quantifiers are permitted.

A

Representational Verification

B

Representational Adequacy

C

Higher Order Logic

D

Inferential Efficiency

Seven people A, B, C, D, E, F and G live on separate floors of a 7-floor building. Ground floor is numbered 1, first floor is numbered. 2 and so on until the topmost floor is numbered 7. Each one of these having a different cars-Cadillac, Ambassador, Fiat, Maruti, Mercedes, Bedford and Fargo but not necessarily in the same order. Only three people live above the floor on which A lives. Only one person lives between A and the one having a car Cadillac. F lives immediately below the one having a car Bedford. The one having a car Bedford lives on an even-numbered floor. Only three people live between the ones having a car Cadillac and Maruti. E lives immediately above C. E is not having a car Maruti. Only two people live between B and the one having a car Fargo. The one having a car Fargo lives below the floor on which B lives. The one having a car Fiat does not live immediately above D or immediately below B. D does not live immediately above or immediately below A. G does not have a car Ambassador. Question : How many people live between the floors on which D and the one having a car Bedford ?

A

One

B

Two

C

Three

D

Four

Use quantifiers and predicates with more than one variable to express, “There is a pupil in this lecture who has taken at least one course in Discrete Maths.”

A

∃x∃yP (x, y), where P (x, y) is “x has taken y,” the domain for x consists of all pupil in this class, and the domain for y consists of all Discrete Maths lectures

B

∃x∃yP (x, y), where P (x, y) is “x has taken y,” the domain for x consists of all Discrete Maths lectures, and the domain for y consists of all pupil in this class

C

∀x∀yP(x, y), where P (x, y) is “x has taken y,” the domain for x consists of all pupil in this class, and the domain for y consists of all Discrete Maths lectures

D

∃x∀yP(x, y), where P (x, y) is “x has taken y,” the domain for x consists of all pupil in this class, and the domain for y consists of all Discrete Maths lectures

The propositions are: Under Order XVIII, Rule 2 of Code of Civil Procedure
1. Written arguments can be filed before the conclusion of oral arguments
2. A copy of the written arguments shall be punished simultaneously to the other party
3. Adjournment shall be granted generally for the purpose of filing the written arguments
4. the Court cannot fix any time-limit for oral arguments
Which of the following is correct in respect of the aforesaid propositions:

A

1 and 3 are correct, 2 and 4 are incorrect

B

1 and 2 are correct, 3 and 4 are incorrect

C

1 and 4 are correct, 2 and 3 are incorrect

D

3 and 4 are correct, 1 and 2 are incorrect

Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.

Statement : Should there be compulsory medical examination of both the man and the woman before they marry each other?

Arguments :
I. No. This is an intrusion to the privacy of an individual and hence cannot be tolerated.
II. Yes. This will substantially reduce the risk of giving birth to children with serious ailments.

A

Only argument I is strong

B

Only argument II is strong

C

Either I or II is strong

D

Neither I nor II is strong

E

Both I and II are strong

Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by four arguments I, II, III and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.

Statement : Should all the youngsters below 21 years of age be disallowed from going to a beer bar?

Arguments :
I. No. It is not correct to prevent matured youngsters above 18 years of age who can vote, from having fun.
II. Yes. The entry fee to such pubs should also be hiked.
III. No. There is no such curb in western countries.
IV. Yes. This will help in preventing youngsters from getting into bad company and imbibing bad habits.

A

Only I is strong

B

Only I and III are strong

C

Only III and IV are strong

D

Only I and IV are strong

E

None is strong

Bangladesh expects every man to do his duty. Here “every“is use as A. Numeral adjective B. Demonstrative adjective C. Possessive adjective D. Distributive adjective E. Adjective of Quantity

A

Numeral adjective

B

Demonstrative adjective

C

Possessive adjective

D

Distributive adjective

Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments I, II and III . You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.

Statement : Should all the students graduating in any discipline desirous of pursuing post-graduation of the subjects of their choice be allowed to enrol in the post-graduate courses?

Arguments :
I. Yes. The students are the best judge of their capabilities and there should not be restrictions for joining post-graduate courses.
II. No. The students need to study relevant subjects in graduate courses to enrol in post-graduate courses and the students must fulfil such conditions.
III. No. There are not enough institutes offering post-graduate courses which can accommodate all the graduates desirous of seeking post-graduate education of their own choice.

A

None is strong

B

Only I and II are strong

C

All are strong

D

Only I and III are strong

E

None of these

Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.

Statement : Should there be a cap on maximum number of contestants for parliamentary elections in any constituency?

Arguments :
I. Yes. This will make the parliamentary elections more meaningful as the voters can make a considered judgement for casting their vote.
II. No. In a democracy any person fulfilling the eligibility criteria can contest parliamentary elections and there should be no restrictions.

A

Only argument I is strong

B

Only argument II is strong

C

Either I or II is strong

D

Neither I nor II is strong

E

Both I and II are strong

Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.

Statement : Should family planning be made compulsory in India?

Arguments :
I. Yes. Looking to the miserable conditions in India, there is no other go.
II. No. In India there are people of various religions and family planning is against the tenets of some of the religions.

A

Only argument I is strong

B

Only argument II is strong

C

Either I or II is strong

D

Neither I nor II is strong

E

Both I and II are strong