Get Advice on Live Video Call
Earn $ Cash $ with
consultations on Bissoy App

Consider the following statements on the appointment of Chief Justice of Jharkhand High Court.<br>1. The President of India appoints the Chief Justice of High Court in consultation with the Chief Justice of India.<br>2. The opinions of the Governor of the other states is also taken for the appointment.<br>Which of the statement(s) given above is/are correct?

Correct Answer: Only 1
The President of India appoints the Chief Justice of High Court in consultation with the Chief Justice of India.

Which among the following statements is/are not true about the executive powers of the Governor?
1. The Governor appoints the Vice-Chancellor of the universities of the state.
2. The Governor acts as the Chancellor of the universities of the state.
3. The Governor appoints the Chief minister and other state ministers.
4. The Governor appoints the advocate general of the state.

Where two or more courts have taken cognizance of the same offence and a question arises as to which of them ought to inquire into or try the offence, the question shall be decided
1. If the courts are subordinate to the same High Court, by that High Court
2. By the High Court within the local limits of whose appellate criminal jurisdiction the accused resides, carries on business or is engaged in a gainful employment
3. If the courts are subordinate to the same High Court, by that High Court in consultation with the State Government concerned
4. If the courts are not subordinate to the same High Court, by that court within the local limits of whose appellate criminal jurisdiction the proceedings were first commenced
Which of the above are correct?

Consider the following statements:
1. The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in any dispute between the Government of India and one or more States.
2. The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in any dispute between the Government of India and any State or States on one side and one or more other State on the other.
3. The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in any dispute between the Government of India and any corporation of Individual one side and one or more States on the other.
4. The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in any dispute between two or more States.
Which of these statements are correct?

Which of the following statements are correct? Answer by using the code given below:
1. Persons in Govt/Judicial service need not resign to participate in District judge selection process held in "Vijay Kumar Misra and another v. High Court of Judicature at Patna" by the Supreme Court of India
2. The Supreme Court of India held in S. Kazi v. Muslim Education Society that " All Tribunals are not necessary parties to the proceedings where legality of its orders challenged"
3. The Supreme Court of India observed in Cardanumom Marketing Corporation and others v. State of Kerala and others that Social Security to the legal profession becomes an essential part of legal system
4. The Supreme Court of India held in 'Union of India v. Rajasthan High Court and others that High Court judges are exempted from Airport frisking.

Consider the following statement and indentify the personality
1. He is very active in the state polities and also was a founding member of Jharkhand Mukti Morcha.
2. For three times he was elected for the post of Chief Minister of Jharkhand.
3. He included the youth in the demand for a separate state of Jharkhand by forming (AJSU) All Jharkhand Students Union.
The above statements denoted which personality of Jharkhand?

Consider the following statements:
1. The powers of High Courts under Article 226 of the Constitution of India are wider than those of Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution of India.
2. Both High Court and Supreme Court have concurrent power to enforce the fundamental rights.
3. It is mandatory for a petitioner first to approach the High Court instead of approaching the Supreme Court directly for enforcement of fundamental rights.
Which of the statements given above are correct?

Consider the following statements
1. The High Court of Punjab was renamed as the High Court of Punjab and Haryana.
2. The judges of the High Court of Punjab became judges of the common High Court of Punjab.
3. The principal seat of the High Court remained at Chandigarh.
Which of the statement(s) given above is/are correct?

Consider the following statements:
1. The President shall appoint a person who is qualified to be appointed a judge of a High Court to be Attorney-General for India.
2. In the performance of his duties the Attorney-General shall have right of audience in all courts in India.
3. The Attorney-General shall hold office during the pleasure of the President and shall receive such remuneration as the President may determine.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Consider the following statements:
1. After the President of India has asked the Council of Ministers to reconsider the advice given by the Council of Ministers, the President may not act in accordance with the advice rendered after such reconsideration.
2. The President of India can grant pardon under Article 72 of the Constitution of India, to any person convicted of any offence.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Consider the following judgments of the Supreme Court which dealt with the appointment and transfer of judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts:
1. S. P. Gupta v. Union of India
2. Sankal Chand Seth v. Union of India
3. In re Special Reference No. 1 of 1998
4. Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association v. Union of India
Which one of the following is the correct chronological order in which the above judgments were delivered?