Get Advice on Live Video Call
Earn $ Cash $ with
consultations on Bissoy App

An ex parte decree passed by Court 'A' was transferred to Court 'B' for execution and which execution proceedings are pending in Court 'B'. Court 'A' aside the ex parte decree and on re-hearing, a fresh decree was passed on the same terms.

Correct Answer: The execution proceedings in Court 'B' come to an end a fresh execution petition would have to be filed of the new decree

X sues A and B on a promissory note executed by A, B is A's nephew, and he is joined as a defendant on the ground that A and B are member of a joint Hindu family, and that the note was for a debt binding on the family. None of the defendant appears at the hearing and an ex parte decree is passed against both the defendants.
The decree against A proceeds on the ground that the note was passed by him and against B on the ground that the debt was incurred for a family purpose. B applies for an order to set aside the decree, alleging that the summons was not served upon him and that the debt in respect of which the note was passed by A was not incurred for a family purpose. It is not disputed that the amount was actually advanced to A.

Which of the followingconditions has to be satisfied for the application of Section 14, Limitation Act, 1963?
1. Both the prior and subsequent proceeding are civil proceedings prosecuted by the same party
2. The prior proceedings had been prosecuted with due diligence and in good faith
3. The failure of the prior proceedings was due to defect of jurisdiction or cause of the nature
4. The earlier proceedings and later proceeding must relate to the same matter in issue
5. Both the proceedings are in Court

When an ex parte decree is passed, the defendant would normally ask for setting aside of ex parte decree:

A decree was transferred for its execution from Court X to Court Y. Court Y is of the opinion that Court X committed an error when it calculated the limitation period. Court Y announced that it rectified the mistake of Court X and upheld the rule of law by pronouncing judgment in favour of judgment debtor. This was challenged by the decree holder in the appellate court. Predict whether the decree holder will win the case.

"At times proceedings are adjourned sine die on account of stay. Even after stay is vacated, intimation is not received and proceedings are not taken up. In an attempt to remedy this, situation, we consider it appropriate to direct that in all pending cases where stay against proceedings of a civil or criminal trial is operating, the same will come to an end on expiry of six months from today unless in an exceptional case by a speaking order such stay is extended". This observation was made by the Supreme Court recently in which one of the following cases:

A court transferred a, decree to another court for its execution suo motu. Judgment holder appealed to the High Court and argued that the lower court judge was partial toward the decree holder and submitted the suo motu transfer of decree for its execution as proof. Decide the outcome of the case.

Which of the following statement/statements is/are correct? Give correct answer:
1. An ordinary Bill can only originate in council of states
2. A Bill pending in House of people shall not lapse by reason of the prorogation of the House
3. A Bill pending in the council of state which has not been passed by the House of people shall not lapse on a dissolution of the House of the people
4. A Bill pending in the House of people shall not lapse by reason of the dissolution of the House.

In a suit for partition three defendants were set ex parte. Preliminary decree was passed. On the application of one of the three defendants the Court set aside the decree as against all the defendants. The order of the court is

Under which of the following provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 an ex parte order and ex parte decree may be set aside?

A sued to recover a house from B and certain lands from C. The suit was decreed ex parte against both defendants. B applied to set aside the ex parte decree and having settled the dispute with A applied to withdraw his petition. C then applied to be transposed as petitioner.