Bissoy
Login
Get Advice on Live Video Call
Earn $ Cash $ with
consultations on Bissoy App
Ram Lal & Co., a sole proprietary of Ram Lal, files a suit against 'X' for recovery of money. 'X' files a Counter Claim in the said suit for recovery of money owed by Shyam Lal & Co., a sole proprietary of Shyam Lal, son of Ram Lal:
A
Issues will be framed in the suit and Counter Claim
B
Shyam Lal will be impleaded as plaintiff in the suit
C
Shyam Lal will be impleaded as defendant in the suit
D
Counter Claim will be returned
Correct Answer:
Counter Claim will be returned
Consider the 5 × 5 matrix \[{\text{A}} = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} 1&2&3&4&5 \\ 5&1&2&3&4 \\ 4&5&1&2&3 \\ 3&4&5&1&2 \\ 2&3&4&5&1 \end{array}} \right
A
\
B
<br>It is given that A has only one real eigen value.<br>Then the real eigen value of A is
C
<p><span>A.</span> -2.5
D
</span> 0
Mark the incorrect proposition:
1. Set-off is a statutory defence to a plaintiff's action, whereas a counterclaim is a cross-action.
2. Set-off and counter-claim arises out of the same transaction.
3. Set-off should not be barred on the date of the suit while counter-claim should not be barred on the date of filing of written statement.
4. Claim for set-off cannot exceed plaintiff's claim, whereas counterclaim can exceed the plaintiffs claim.
5. Both set-off and counter-claim cannot exceed the pecuniary jurisdiction of the court.
A
1 only
B
2 only
C
3 and 5
D
4 only
Propositions are:
1. Set-off and counter-claim arises out of the same transaction.
2. Set-off should not be barred on the date of the suit while counter-claim should not be barred on the date of filing of written statement.
3. Claim for set-off cannot exceed plaintiff's claim, whereas counter-claim can exceed the plaintiff's claim.
In respect of the aforesaid which is correct:
A
All 1, 2 and 3 are correct
B
1 and 2 are correct 3 is incorrect
C
1 and 3 are correct 2 is incorrect
D
2 and 3 are correct 1 is incorrect
In a suit for recovery of Rs. 25 lakh, the Defendant files its written statement and pleads that it does not owe any money to the Plaintiff but in fact, it is entitled to recover the sum of Rs. 40 lakh from the Plaintiff. The Defendant, however, does not file a counter claim. Can the Defendant file the counter claim at a subsequent stage in the suit or file a fresh suit seeking recovery of Rs, 40 lakhs?
A
The counter claim and suit would be barred
B
Only the counter claim would be barred
C
The Defendant can file both either a counter claim or a suit
D
The Defendant's claim stands abandoned
Consider the following statement(s).
1. A defendant may set up, by way of a counter-claim against the claim of the plaintiff any right or claim in respect of the cause of action accruing to him.
2. The counter-claim may be submitted by the defendant even after he has delivered his defence.
3. The counter-claim shall not exceed the pecuniary jurisdiction of the court.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
A
1 and 2
B
1 and 3
C
2 and 3
D
All these
Ram was dispossessed from his house by Shyam for a year. Ram files a suit for possession against Shyam but did not included claim for for damages in it. For claiming damages Ram:
A
Could file a new suit
B
Could not file a new suit
C
Could file a new suit with permission of the court
D
None of the above
Ram aged 25 years, tell Shyam who is aged 17 years and on account of the death of his father is sad, that if Shyam dies by jumping in a burning pyre of a woman he i.e. Shyam would meet his father in heaven and would find bliss. Shyam, aged 17 years, know that by doing so he would be committing suicide, but on account of instigation by Ram suffers death by jumping in the burning pyre of a woman. Ram is guilty of:
A
Abetment for the suicide committed by Shyam
B
Murder of Shyam
C
No offence
D
Both A and B above
To constitute a matter of res judicata which of the following conditions must concur?
1. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit or issue must be the same matter which was directly and substantially in issue either actually (section 11, explanation III) or constructively (section 11, explanation IV) in the former suit
2. The former suit must have been a suit between the same parties under whom they or any of them claim. Explanation VI of Section 11 must be read with this condition
3. The parties as aforesaid must have litigated under the same title in the former suit
4. The court which decided the former suit must have been a court competent to try the subsequent suit of the suit in which such issue has been subsequently raised. Explanation II of section 11 is to be read with condition
5. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit must have been heard and finally decided by the court in the first suit. Explanation V of section 11 is to be read with this condition
A
1, 2
B
3, 4
C
2, 4, 5
D
All of these
Ram's son's age is $$\frac{1}{3}$$ of Ram's wife's age. Ram's wife's age is $$\frac{4}{5}$$ of Ram's age and Ram's age is $$\frac{3}{5}$$ of Ram's father's age. Find the age of Ram's son, if Ram's father is 50 years old ?
A
6 years
B
8 years
C
10 years
D
12 years
A', an Indian citizen, enters into a contract with 'B', a US citizen based in the USA. Certain disputes arise under the contract, and 'B' files a suit in the matter in the civil court of New York. 'A' files a counter claim in the said suit. Subsequently, 'A' files a suit in the same matter in the jurisdictional Civil Court in New Delhi. Is the latter court barred from trying the suit?
A
Yes, since this will lead to multiplicity of proceedings
B
Yes, since by filing a counter claim A has accepted the jurisdiction of the courts of New York
C
No, because the pendency of a suit in a foreign court does not preclude courts in India from trying a suit based on the same cause of action
D
No, because A is the defendant in the first suit and the plaintiff in the second suit