In criminal proceedings, under which of the following situations, the fact that the accused person has bad character, is relevant? 1. Where the character of the accused is in issue 2. When it affects damages 3. To rebut prior evidence of good character 4. Where the court is satisfied Select the correct answer:

Consider the following statements:
1. In criminal proceedings good character of the accused is always relevant
2. In criminal proceedings bad character of the accused is always relevant
3. In a civil case evidence of character of any person concerned is always admissible
4. A previous conviction is relevant as evidence of bad character
Which of the statements given above are correct?

A

2 and 3

B

1, 2 and 4

C

1 and 4

D

1, 2 and 3

Which of the followingconditions has to be satisfied for the application of Section 14, Limitation Act, 1963?
1. Both the prior and subsequent proceeding are civil proceedings prosecuted by the same party
2. The prior proceedings had been prosecuted with due diligence and in good faith
3. The failure of the prior proceedings was due to defect of jurisdiction or cause of the nature
4. The earlier proceedings and later proceeding must relate to the same matter in issue
5. Both the proceedings are in Court

A

1, 3, 5

B

2, 4, 5

C

1, 5

D

All of these

Evidences are adduced by the parties to the suit about the 'character'. As per the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, which of the following is/are correct?
1. Evidence of the character in civil proceedings is irrelevant and inadmissible generally.
2. The character evidence is admissible if it affects the amount of damages which he ought to receive.
3. The character evidence is admissible in so far as such character appears from facts otherwise relevant.
Select the correct answer:

A

1 only

B

1 and 2 only

C

2 and 3 only

D

1, 2 and 3

Select the incorrect statements:
1. The Indian Evidence Act does not apply to arbitration proceedings.
2. The Indian Evidence Act does not apply to proceedings before a Commissioner appointed by the court for recording evidence
3. The Indian Evidence Act applies to affidavits presented to Courts
4. The Indian Evidence Act applies to judicial proceedings held before all kinds of military courts

A

2 and 3 are incorrect

B

2, 3 and 4 are incorrect

C

1 and 3 are incorrect

D

None of the above is incorrect

Each material circumstance appearing in evidence against the accused must be put to the accused specifically, distinctly and separately. In this context, the propositions are
1. Failure to put the material evidence to the accused always vitiates the trial
2. Failure to put the material evidence amounts to a serious irregularity which can not be cured and vitiates the trial, if it has prejudiced the accused.
3. Failure to put the material evidence is not considered to services & is curable if infact no failure of justice has occasioned to the accused.
Now which of the following is correct

A

1 and 2 are correct

B

1 and 3 are correct

C

1, 2 and 3 all are correct

D

2 and 3 all are correct

Assertion (A): In criminal cases the fact that accused is of good character is relevant.
Reason (R): In criminal cases bad character of the accused is always irrelevant.
Select the correct answer:

A

Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A

B

Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A

C

A is true but R is false

D

A is false but R is true

Which of the following statement is correct?
1. Evidence of character in civil cases isirrelevant.
2. Previous conviction is relevant as evidence of bad character.
3. Evidence of good character is relevant in criminal cases.
4. Word cases character includes reputation only.

A

1 and 3 are correct

B

1, 2 and 3 are correct

C

2 and 3 are correct

D

All are correct

Where two or more courts have taken cognizance of the same offence and a question arises as to which of them ought to inquire into or try the offence, the question shall be decided
1. If the courts are subordinate to the same High Court, by that High Court
2. By the High Court within the local limits of whose appellate criminal jurisdiction the accused resides, carries on business or is engaged in a gainful employment
3. If the courts are subordinate to the same High Court, by that High Court in consultation with the State Government concerned
4. If the courts are not subordinate to the same High Court, by that court within the local limits of whose appellate criminal jurisdiction the proceedings were first commenced
Which of the above are correct?

A

1 and 2

B

2 and 3

C

1 and 4

D

1, 2, 3 and 4

Under Criminal Procedure Code where two or more courts have taken cognizance of the same offence and question arises as to which of them ought to try that offence, the question shall be decided
1. By the Supreme Court
2. If the Court are subordinate to the same High Court by that High Court
3. If the Courts are not subordinate to the same High Court, by the High Court within the local limits of whose appellate criminal jurisdiction the proceedings were first commenced
Choose the correct answer:

A

Only 1 is correct

B

2 and 3 are correct

C

1, 2 and 3 all are correct

D

1 and 3 are correct

Under Section 27 of the Evidence Act, in respect of confessional evidence
1. So much of the information as it relates distinctly to the fact discovered in consequence of information received from the person accused may be proved against him.
2. Person giving such information must be accused of an offence.
3. Accused need not be in the police custody.
4. Any statement of the accused confessing his guilt must be made in presence of a Magistrate, in all cases, whether anything is discovered or not in consequence of such statement, may be proved against him.

A

1 and 2 are true

B

2 and 3 are true

C

3 and 4 are true

D

1 and 4 are true