Suppose, it is calculated that 'a' is 4 and 'b' is 2 for a particular estimating line with one independent Variable. If the independent variable has a value of 5, what value should be expected for the dependent variable?

Consider the Assertion (A) and Reason (R) and select the correct answer:
Assertion (A) If one premise is particular, the conclusion must be particular.
Reason (R) (i) An affirmative particular has no distributed terms, and a negative particular has an only one.
(ii) The premises cannot both be particular and thus must differ in quantity.

A and R both are true but R (i) and (ii) correct explanations of A

A and R both are true but R (i) is correct explanation of A

A and R both are true but R (ii) is a correct explanation of A

A is true, but R (i) and (ii) are incorrect explanations of A

The value of 'A' of Indian type W.C. shown in the given figure is:

25 cm

30 cm

40 cm

45 cm

The value of 'C' of Indian type W.C. shown in the given figure is:

400 mm

450 mm

500 mm

550 mm

The value of 'B' of Indian type W.C. shown in the given figure is:

45 cm

50 cm

30 cm

25 cm

The reduced levels of points, 30 metres apart along the longitudinal section of a road portion between chainages 5 and 9 are shown in the given figure. If there is a uniform up-gradient of the road 120 in 1, the chainage of the point with no filling or cutting is

(6 + 15) chains

(6 + 12) chains

(6 + 18) chains

None of these

The cross-section of a road partly in banking and partly in cutting is shown in the given figure. The area of the shaded portion is

$$\frac{1}{3} \times \frac{{{{\left( {{\text{b}} - {\text{rd}}} \right)}^2}}}{{{\text{r}} - {\text{s}}}}$$

$$\frac{1}{3} \times \frac{{{{\left( {{\text{b}} - {\text{rd}}} \right)}^2}}}{{{\text{r}} + {\text{s}}}}$$

$$\frac{1}{2} \times \frac{{{{\left( {{\text{b}} + {\text{rd}}} \right)}^2}}}{{{\text{r}} - {\text{s}}}}$$

$$\frac{1}{3} \times \frac{{{{\left( {{\text{b}} - {\text{rd}}} \right)}^2}}}{{{\text{s}} - {\text{r}}}}$$

The area of the cross-section of a road fully in banking shown in the given figure, is

$$\frac{{{\text{s}}{{\text{b}}^2} + {{\text{r}}^2}{{\left( {2{\text{bd}} + {\text{sd}}} \right)}^2}}}{{{{\text{r}}^2} - {{\text{s}}^2}}}$$

$$\frac{{{\text{s}}{{\text{b}}^2} + {{\text{r}}^2}{{\left( {2{\text{bd}} + {\text{sd}}} \right)}^2}}}{{{{\text{r}}^2} - {{\text{s}}^5}}}$$

$$\frac{{{\text{s}}{{\text{b}}^2} + {{\text{r}}^2}{{\left( {2{\text{bd}} + {\text{sd}}} \right)}^2}}}{{{\text{r}} - {\text{s}}}}$$

None of these

The cost of the earthwork in excavation for the surface drain of cross-section shown in the given figure for a total length of 5 metres @ Rs. 450% cum, is

Rs. 400

Rs. 425

Rs. 450

Rs. 500

The cross-sectional area of the embankment of a canal fully in embankment in the given figure is

$$\frac{1}{2}\left( {{{\text{b}}_1} + {{\text{b}}_2}} \right){\text{h}}$$

$$\left( {{{\text{b}}_1} + {{\text{b}}_2}} \right){\text{h}} + {\text{s}}{{\text{h}}^2}$$

$$\left( {{{\text{b}}_1} + {{\text{b}}_2}} \right) + 2{\text{s}}{{\text{h}}^2}$$

$$2\left$$

Referring of given figure, pick up the correct statement from the following:

The total length of centre line of four walls is 20 m

Length of long wall out-to-out is 6.80 m

Length of short walls in-to-in is 3.20 m

All the above