<u>Directions :</u> Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments I, II and III . You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.<br><br><u>Statement :</u> Should "literacy" be the minimum criterion for becoming a voter in India?<br><br><u>Arguments :</u><br> I. No. Mere literacy is no guarantee of political maturity of an individual.<br>II. Yes. Illiterate people are less likely to make politically wiser decisions of voting for a right candidate or party.<br>III. No. Voting is the constitutional right of every citizen.

Correct Answer: All are strong
Clearly, illiterate people lack will power and maturity in thoughts. They may easily be misled into false convictions or lured into temptations to vote for a particular group. So, argument II holds. However, a person is literate does not mean that he is conscious of all political movements, which requires practical awareness of everyday events. Thus, I also holds strong. Besides, Constitution has extended the right to vote equally to all its citizens. Hence, III also holds.