The Katyuri kings dominated the Northern region of the country during 7<sup>th</sup> to 11<sup>th</sup> century. They dominated which region in the state of Uttarakhand?

Consider the given statements as true and decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements. Statements :
Some kings are queens. All queens are beautiful. Conclusions :
1. All kings are beautiful.
2. All queens are kings.

A

Neither 1 nor 2 follows

B

Only conclusion 2 follows

C

Either 1 or 2 follows

D

Only conclusion 1 follows

In the following question, one or two statement(s) is/are given followed by two conclusions/assumptions, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true, even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions/assumptions can definitely be drawn from the givenstatement. Indicate your answer. Statement: Some kings are queens. All queens are beautiful . Conclusions:I All kings are beautiful. Conclusions:II All queens are kings

A

Only conclusion I follows

B

Only conclusion II follows

C

Either conclusion I or II follows

D

Neither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows

Read the statements and select a conclusion from the given alternatives. Statement : Some doctors are kings.
All the kings are handsome. Conclusion : I. All the doctors are handsome.
II. All the kings are doctors.

A

Only conclusion I follows

B

Only conclusion II follows

C

Either I or II follows

D

Neither I nor II follows

Statements : Some kings are queens. All queens are beautiful.

Conclusions :
I. All kings are beautiful.
II. All queens are kings.

A

Only conclusion I follows

B

Only conclusion II follows

C

Either I or II follows

D

Neither I nor II follows

E

Both I and II follow

Statement : Some kings are queens. All the queens are beautiful.

Conclusion :
I. All the kings are beautiful
II. All the queens are kings.

A

Only I foloows

B

Only II follows

C

Either I or II follows

D

Neither I or II follows

E

Both I and II follows.

In Uttaranchal a place of remote antiquity and the principal seat of 'Katyuri' kings is

A

Dunagiri

B

Bageshwar

C

Dwarahat

D

Jageshwar

The gypsys are a tribe of strange people. They do not have any fixed home but wander about from place to place and live in tents. they were originally natives of India. But as they reached England from Egypt ,the English took them from Egyptians. this is why they came to be called gypsys. they were beloved to possess strange powers. they could tell your fortune by reading the palm of your hand. it was thought they stole little children to train them in their way of life. whenever a child got lost it was thought that it has been carried away by gypsys so they were arrested and sent for trial. but this attitude towards the Gypsy has gradually changed.The gypsies are people who ---

A

have a settled way of life

B

came originally from Egypt to England

C

are always on the move

D

steal children to train them in the way of life

Which one of the following statements is/are incorrect?
1. The Green Revolution of India could not effectively spread across Uttarakhand.
2. The low lying areas in the valleys in Uttarakhand are dominated by wet rice cultivation and have compact settlement.

A

Only 1

B

Only 2

C

Both 1 and 2

D

Neither 1 nor 2

Which of the following statements are correct?
1. During the period of the fetus actual growth and development is greater than during the period of embryo.
2. During the period of the embryo and fetus growth follows law of developmental direction.
3. Towards the end of the period of the fetus the amount of activity in the leg region is similar to that of the head region.
4. Muscles in the head region comeunder voluntary control first and those in the leg region later.
Select the correct answer

A

1, 2, 3 and 4

B

1, 2 and 3

C

1 and 2

D

1 and 4

Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives.
Doing an internship at the University of Lille in France, I almost always found myself stuck whenever I had to speak to non-Indians about India or on anything'Indian'. This was more because of the subtle differences in the way the French understood India in comparison to what I thought was 'Indian'. For instance, when I,or any Indian for that matter, say 'Hindi' is an Indian language, what it means is that it is one of the languages widely spoken in India. This need not be similar tothe understanding that the French would have when they hear of 'Hindi' as an Indian language. Because for them Hindi then becomes the only language spoken inIndia. This is a natural inference that the French, Germans, Italians and many other European nationals would tend to make, because that is generally how it is intheir own respective countries. The risk of such inappropriate generalisations made about 'Indian' is not restricted to language alone but also for India's landscape,cuisine, movies, music, climate, economic development and even political ideologies. The magnitude of diversity of one European country can be easily compared tothat of one of the Indian State, isn't it? Can they imagine that India is one country whose diversity can be equated to that of the entire European continent? Theonus is upon us to go ahead and clarify the nuances in 'Indianness' while we converse. But why should one do so? How does it even matter to clarify? The writer was working at a university in which country?

A

France

B

Germany

C

Italy

D

India