Which of the following statements are correct in context to Rajasthan State Human Rights Commission? 1. It was constituted on 18, January, 1999 by notification issued by Government of Rajasthan 2. The Commission became functional from March, 2000. 3. Rajasthan Human Rights Commission is having one Chairperson and 3 members in accordance with the provision of the Protection of Human Rights (Amendment) Act, 2006. 4. One of its former Chairman's has retired judge of Supreme Court of India. Select the correct answer the given below:

What is not true about the Rajasthan State Human Rights Commission?
Read the following statement and select the correct answer from given below :
1. The commission became fully functional from May 2000.
2. The commission comprises of one full-time chairman and two members.
3. A former chief justice or a former judge of a high court can become chairman of the commission.
4. Justice A.S. Godara was the chairman of the commission from July 2000 to July 2005.

A

1, 2, 3 and 4

B

1, 3 and 4

C

2, 3 and 4

D

2 and 3

Raw material purchased:
1^st January, 600 units @ Rs. 12 per unit
12^th January, 500 units @ Rs. 14 per unit
21^st January, 300 units @ Rs. 13 per unit
Raw material issued for manufacture:
3^rd January 300 units
5^th January 124 units
15^th January 250 units
16^th January 300 units
Raw material returned to stores from manufacturing department on 14^th January, 50 units. The material is issued on First-in-First out method.
The value of material remaining in store on 21^st January will be:

A

5,775

B

6,100

C

6,350

D

6,600

Which of the following statements are correct? Answer by using the code given below:
1. Persons in Govt/Judicial service need not resign to participate in District judge selection process held in "Vijay Kumar Misra and another v. High Court of Judicature at Patna" by the Supreme Court of India
2. The Supreme Court of India held in S. Kazi v. Muslim Education Society that " All Tribunals are not necessary parties to the proceedings where legality of its orders challenged"
3. The Supreme Court of India observed in Cardanumom Marketing Corporation and others v. State of Kerala and others that Social Security to the legal profession becomes an essential part of legal system
4. The Supreme Court of India held in 'Union of India v. Rajasthan High Court and others that High Court judges are exempted from Airport frisking.

A

Only 2 is correct

B

1, 2 and 3 are correct

C

2, 3 and 4 are correct

D

1, 2 and 4 are correct

Consider the following statements to answer this question.
1. Parliament cannot extend the jurisdiction and power of the Supreme Court.
2. No discussion can take place in Parliament with respect to the conduct of judge of the Supreme Court in discharge of the duties.
3. A retired judge of the Supreme Court cannot appear or plead in any court or before any authority within the territory of India.
4. The salaries and allowances of the Supreme Court are fixed by the Constitution and charged on the Consolidated Fund of India.
Which of these statement are correct?

A

2, 3 and 4

B

1 and 2

C

1 and 3

D

2 and 4

Consider the following statements:
1. The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in any dispute between the Government of India and one or more States.
2. The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in any dispute between the Government of India and any State or States on one side and one or more other State on the other.
3. The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in any dispute between the Government of India and any corporation of Individual one side and one or more States on the other.
4. The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in any dispute between two or more States.
Which of these statements are correct?

A

1 and 2

B

1, 2 and 4

C

3 and 4 only

D

1, 2, 3 and 4

Which of the following statements are correct?
1. Lawless v. Ireland was the first case decided by the European Court of Human Rights.
2. Ireland v. United Kingdom is related to Article 3 of European Convention of Human Rights which deals with freedom from torture and inhuman or degrading treatment.
3. The U. N. Commission on Human Rights was replaced by Human Rights Committee in March 2006 by the General Assembly.
4. The Commission on the Status of Women is a functional commission of the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) established in 1948.
Choose the correct answer:

A

Only 1 and 2 are correct

B

Only 1 and 3 are correct

C

Only 2 and 3 are correct

D

Only 3 and 4 are correct

Seven people A, B, C, D, E, F and G live on separate floors of a 7-floor building. Ground floor is numbered 1, first floor is numbered. 2 and so on until the topmost floor is numbered 7. Each one of these having a different cars-Cadillac, Ambassador, Fiat, Maruti, Mercedes, Bedford and Fargo but not necessarily in the same order. Only three people live above the floor on which A lives. Only one person lives between A and the one having a car Cadillac. F lives immediately below the one having a car Bedford. The one having a car Bedford lives on an even-numbered floor. Only three people live between the ones having a car Cadillac and Maruti. E lives immediately above C. E is not having a car Maruti. Only two people live between B and the one having a car Fargo. The one having a car Fargo lives below the floor on which B lives. The one having a car Fiat does not live immediately above D or immediately below B. D does not live immediately above or immediately below A. G does not have a car Ambassador. Question : How many people live between the floors on which D and the one having a car Bedford ?

A

One

B

Two

C

Three

D

Four

A five-judge bench of the Supreme Court passes judgment in a matter. In a later case before a high court, a party presents the Supreme Court judgment as a binding authority. The opposing party claims that the high court is not bound by the Supreme Court's judgment because relevant provisions of law were not brought to the notice of the Supreme Court in that case. Which of the following is most correct in this case?
Principle: Article 141 of the Constitution provides that the law declared by the Supreme Court is binding on all courts within the territory of India.

A

Since the relevant provisions of law were not brought to the notice of the Supreme Court, the five-judge bench's decision is not 'law' within the meaning of Article 141, and is not binding on the high court

B

The Supreme Court must expressly declare that its judgment is binding on all courts within the territory of India when passing judgment. In this case, the Supreme Court has not done so, and therefore, the decision of the five-judge bench is not binding on the high court

C

The High Court cannot ignore the decision of the Supreme Court on the ground that relevant provisions of law were not brought to its notice. Under Article 141, it is bound by the decision of the Supreme Court

D

Only those decisions that are passed by a larger bench than the five-judge bench would be hinding on the high court, since legitimate doubts have been raised about the propriety of the five-judge bench's decision

E

The decision of the five-judge bench, since it is in conflict with other decisions, must first be decided upon by a larger bench on the Supreme Court. Only after that would the decision be binding on all other courts under Article 141 of the Constitution

Which of the following statements are correct in relation to 'administrative control' of forums and commission under Section 24-B of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986?
(1) National Commission shall have administrative control over all State Commissions.
(2) National Commission shall call for the periodical return of 'pendency of cases' before the State Commissions.
(3) State Commission shall have administrative control over all district forums.
(4) State Commission can issue instructions to district forums to furnish English translation of judgements written in any language.
Choose the correct answer from the given below:

A

(1) and (3) are correct

B

(2) and (4) are correct

C

(1), (2) and (3) are correct

D

(1), (2), (3) and (4) are correct

Arrange the following Acts enacted by Indian government as per TRIPS agreement.
1. Patent Act, 1999, 2002 and 2005.
2. Protection of Traditional Knowledge under Patent Amendmerit Act, 2002.
3. The Design Act, 1999.
4. A new Trademarks Act, 1999 has been enacted.
5. The Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958.

A

1, 3, 2, 4, 5

B

5, 4, 3, 1, 2

C

2, 1, 4, 3, 5

D

3, 2, 5, 1, 4