Get Advice on Live Video Call
Earn $ Cash $ with
consultations on Bissoy App

Which of the following persons will come under Marumakkattayam law as per Section 3 of The Hindu Succession Act, 1956?<br>1. Those who would have been governed by The Travancore Ezhava Act of 1100<br>2. Those who would have been governed by The Cochin Nayar Act of 1113<br>3. Those who would have been governed by The Cochin Nambudri Act, 1113

Correct Answer: 1 and 2

Which of the followings will come under Nambudri law as per section 3 of The Hindu Succession Act, 1956?
1. Those who would have been governed by The Madras Nambudri Act, 1932
2. Those who would have been governed by The Travancore Kshatriya Act of 1108
3. Those who would have been governed by The Travancore Malaya Brahmin Act of 1106

Carefully read following statements:
1. According to Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, requirement is of two persons, whereas under Section 149 of Indian Penal Code, requirement is of five persons.
2. According to Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, common intention is required whereas under Section 149 Indian Penal Code, common object is required
3. Previous consent is required under Section 34 & 149 of Indian Penal Code
4. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 149 of Indian Penal Code constitutes a specific offence
Which of the above statements is true:

Given below are two statements
Statement I: Two Hindus married under the Special Marriage Act, 1954 are governed by the Indian Succession Act, 1925 in matters of inheritance.
Statement II: Two Muslims married under the Special Marriage Act, 1954 are governed by the Indian Succession Act, 1925 in matters of inheritance.
In light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below

Property inherited by a Hindu male under section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 on the death of said Hindu, the devolution of such property shall be governed by

In the following passage, some of the words have been left out. Read the passage carefully and select the correct answer for the given blank out of thefour alternatives.
In a dynamic society everything is provided for by law and only a few things are __________ to politicians. The universe is governed ________ law. The inverse squarelaw __________ the earth in its orbit and the law of atomic fusion keeps the sun shining ________ the whole earth. Likewise, the law should govern a nation where thejudge, the police and the civil servant dispense ___________ to the citizen.
The universe is governed ________ law.

Three persons A, B and C are standing in a queue. There are five persons between A and B and eight persons between B and C. If there be three persons ahead of C and 21 persons behind A, what could be the minimum number of persons in the queue?

The male Hindu dies after the commencement of Hindu Succession Act. (But before the Hindu Succession Amendment Act. 2005) He was having interest in Mitakshra Coparcenery property at the time of his death:

Which of the following distinguishes section 34 of Indian Penal Code from section 149, Indian Penal Code?
1. Section 149 creates a substantive offence whereas section 34 does not create an offence.
2. Section 149 requires common object whereas section 34 requires common intention.
3. Section 149 requires five or more persons whereas section 34 requires two or more persons.
Select the correct answer:

Consider the following statements:
1. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code requires two persons whereas Section 149 of Indian Penal Code require five persons.
2. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code requires common intention, whereas Section 149 of Indian Penal Code requires common object
3. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 149 of Indian Penal Code both require presence of a prior consent
4. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and section 149 of Indian Penal Code. Both create specific offence
Which of the above statements are correct?

Even right of women to derive interest in a property by way of inheritance, gift or bequeath is statutorily accepted by reason of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 and other enactments. This court (Supreme Court), therefore, while considering constitutionality of section 118 of the Indian Succession Act, is entitled to take those facts also into those consideration. This lines are the part of the judgment of