Bissoy
Login
Get Advice on Live Video Call
Earn $ Cash $ with
consultations on Bissoy App
Can anticipatory bail be granted in respect of bailable offences, and if so in what circumstances?
A
Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in bailable offences
B
Bail can be granted only in case the petitioner is a woman, a minor or a sick person
C
There is no distinction between bailable and non-bailable offences so far as anticipatory bail is concerned
D
None of the above
Correct Answer:
Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in bailable offences
Statement A: Bail granted under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has same incidents as bail granted under Chapter XXXIII of the Code.
Statement B: Bail granted under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 cannot be cancelled under Section 437(5) of the Code.
A
Statement A is correct
B
Statement B is correct
C
Both the statements are correct
D
Both the statements are incorrect
Consider the following statements:
Bailable offence within the meaning of Criminal Procedure Code means
1. An offence which is enumerated as bailable in the First Schedule.
2. An offence which is made bailable by any other law for the time being in force.
3. All other offences as stated in criminal law.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
A
1, 2 and 3
B
2 and 3
C
1 and 2 only
D
1 and 3 only
Where an accused is granted bail under section 167(2), proviso (a) of Criminal Procedure Code and on filing on charge-sheet the investigation revealed that the accused has committed a serious offence, the bail so granted under section 167(2), proviso (a) of Criminal Procedure Code
A
Cannot be cancelled in the absence of special reasons
B
Can be cancelled under section 437(5)
C
Can be cancelled under section 439(2)
D
Can be cancelled under section 437(5) or section 439(2)
When any person has reason to believe that he may be arrested on an accusation of having committed a non-bailable offence he may apply for anticipatory bail under
A
Section 436 Criminal Procedure Code
B
Section 437 Criminal Procedure Code
C
Section 438 Criminal Procedure Code
D
Section 449 Criminal Procedure Code
Under the scheme of Criminal Procedure Code offences have been classified into bailable and non bailable, cognizable and non cognizable under:
A
The first schedule
B
The second schedule
C
Section 320
D
Section 300
Provisions of Chapter XXIA Criminal Procedure Code are not applicable to cases where the final report discloses:
1. Offences punishable for death
2. Offences punishable for imprisonment of life
3. Offences punishable for a term exceeding seven years' imprisonment
4. Offences punishable for a term exceeding three years' imprisonment
Which of the following is correct:
A
1, 3 and 4
B
2, 3 and 4
C
1, 2 and 3
D
1, 2 and 4
The classification of offences into bailable and non-bailable has been given in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, under:
A
The 1<sup>st</sup> Schedule
B
The 2<sup>nd</sup> Schedule
C
Section 320
D
Section 482
Classification of Bailable and Non-bailable offences in Criminal Procedure Code is provided under
A
First Schedule of Criminal Procedure Code
B
Second Schedule of Criminal Procedure Code
C
Section 320 of Criminal Procedure Code
D
Section 321 of Criminal Procedure Code
For which one of the following offences under Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 can be moved?
A
Bailable offence
B
Non-bailable offence
C
Cognizable offence
D
Non-cognizable offence
Five persons concert to loot a bank. Two of them, M and N, stay on in the car, with the engine running on, at the entrance of the bank. Three of them X, Y, and Z, enter the bank. X shoots the cashier, and Y and Z loot the cash. Police suddenly reaches the bank and apprehends, Y and Z but X escapes. On seeing the police enter the bank, M and N also run away in the car. Later on, all the five are arrested and charged with the offences of dacoity, looting and murder. M and N plead that they are not guilty of any of the offences, certainly not of murder and looting, as they did not participate in any of these offences. Should their plea prevail?
A
M and N are not liable for committing robbery and murder
B
M and N are at best liable for abetting robbery, but not of committing it
C
Since the looting of the bank was committed in furtherance of the common intention of all the five, M and N are equally liable for looting and murder along with X, Y and Z and thus their defence will not prevail
D
M and N has no complicity in any of the offences