Get Advice on Live Video Call
Earn $ Cash $ with
consultations on Bissoy App

If an accused is charged of a major offence, but on the facts established he cannot be held guilty of that major offence. At the same time the facts established indicates that the minor offence has been committed, the person so tried for major offence can be convicted for such minor offence, it has been so provided

Correct Answer: Under Section 222 of Criminal Procedure Code

Assertion (A): Where an accused person has pleaded guilty and has been convicted on such plea, there shall be no appeal.
Reason (R): A person who deliberately pleads guilty cannot be aggrieved by being convicted.
Select the correct answer:

Consider the following statement(s).
A police officer has the power to arrest any person without an order from a magistrate or warrant of arrest, if he has reason to suspect his complicity in a cognizable offence punishable with imprisonment which may extend to seven years, provided that he is satisfied for reasons in writing that such arrest is necessary
1. To prevent such person from committing any further offence.
2. For proper investigation of the offence.
3. To prevent such person from tampering with or causing the evidence of the offence to disappear.
4. To compel the absconding co-accused to surrender.
Which of the statements given above are correct?

10 persons were charged for offence under section 302/149 of Indian Penal Code which has been committed by only one person, and out of the 10, nine except the one who actually committed the offence, were acquitted, the person who actually committed the offence

A' and 'B' have been accused of an offence where the accused persons had no intention of causing the death of any one and no injury was found on the deceased which was sufficient to cause death in the ordinary course of nature. As per medical opinion, the injuries were not likely to cause death. It could not be established as to which of the two accused inflicted injuries on the head of the deceased. The accused should be liable to be convicted under:

Which of the following statements are true?
(1) Minor's contract can be ratified on attaining majority.
(2) Minor's contract cannot be ratified on attaining majority.
(3) Minor's contract can be ratified jointly by both the parties to the contract.
(4) Minor is not liable under minor's contract.
(5) Minor's contract is an enforceable contract.

Under Section 27 of the Evidence Act, in respect of confessional evidence
1. So much of the information as it relates distinctly to the fact discovered in consequence of information received from the person accused may be proved against him.
2. Person giving such information must be accused of an offence.
3. Accused need not be in the police custody.
4. Any statement of the accused confessing his guilt must be made in presence of a Magistrate, in all cases, whether anything is discovered or not in consequence of such statement, may be proved against him.

Sister of Ram Prakash married a person belonging to another caste. The marriage was not approved by some influential members of the community of Ram Prakash. They influenced the members of the community to excommunicate the family of Ram Prakash. However later on the caste leaders asked Ram Prasad to give Rs. one lac to the community as a penance and only then his family would be admitted in the community. But Ram Prasad instead of delivering money files an F. I. R. (First information Report) The community leaders who demanded money claimed no offence has been committed as Ram Prasad was guilty of violating community rules and in fact no money has actually been delivered. What offence, if any, has been committed by the community leaders?

Which of the following Articles of the 'Constitution' relate to the doctrine, if a person is tried and acquitted or convicted of an offence, he cannot be tried again for the same offence?

PRINCIPLES: 1. Nothing is an offence which is done in the exercise of the right of private defense.
2. When an act, which would otherwise be a certain offence, is not that offence, by reason of the youth, the want of maturity of understanding, the unsoundness of mind or the intoxication of that person or by reason of misconception on the part of that person, every person has the same right of private defense against that act, which he would have if that act were an offence.
3. Everyone has the right to defend their life and property against criminal harm provided it is not possible to approach public authorities and more harm than that is necessary has not been caused to avert the danger.
4. If in the exercise of right of private defense against an assault which reasonably causes the apprehension of death, the defender be so situated that he cannot effectually exercise that right without risk of harm to an innocent person, his right of private defense extends to the running of that risk.
5. The right of private defense continues as long as apprehension of danger continues.
FACT: A enters by night a house which he is legally entitled to enter. Z, in good faith, taking A for a housebreaker, attacks A.

Statements : All terrorists are guilty. All terrorists are criminals.

Conclusions :
I. Either all criminals are guilty or all guilty are criminals.
II. Some guilty persons are criminals.
III. Generally criminals are guilty.
IV. Crime and guilt go together.