Get Advice on Live Video Call
Earn $ Cash $ with
consultations on Bissoy App

<u>Statements :</u> Some dogs are rats. All rats are trees. Some trees are not dogs.<br><br><u>Conclusions :</u><br>I. Some trees are dogs.<br>II. All dogs are trees.<br>III. All rats are dogs.<br>IV. No tree is dog.

Correct Answer: Only I follows
Some dogs are rats. All rats are trees.

Since one premise is particular, the conclusion must be particular and should not contain the middle term. So, it follows that 'Some dogs are trees'. I is the converse of this conclusion and so it holds.

All rats are trees. Some trees are not dogs.

Since the middle term 'trees' is not distributed even once in the premises, no definite conclusion follows.

Below is the list of answers given by students as their favorite pet. Determine the frequency of dog. dog, cat, fish, turtle, cat, rabbit, turtle, dog, cat, dog, cat, dog, dog, turtle, dog, cat, cow, fish, rabbit, dog, cat, dog, cat, cat, dog, turtle, rabbit, cat, fish, dog, turtle

Consider the given statement as true and decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements.
Statement:
No dog is a cat. Some cats are rats. All rats are pigs.
Conclusions:
1. All dogs are rats
2. All pigs are rats
3. Some pigs are cats
4. No pig is a dog

Fact 1: All dogs like to run.
Fact 2: Some dogs like to swim.
Fact 3: Some dogs look like their masters.

If the first three statements are facts, which of the following statements must also be a fact?
I: All dogs who like to swim look like their masters.
II: Dogs who like to swim also like to run.
III: Dogs who like to run do not look like their masters.

Children are in pursuit of a dog whose leash has broken. James is directly behind the dog. Ruby is behind James. Rachel is behind Ruby. Max is ahead of the dog walking down the street in the opposite direction. As the children and dog pass, Max turns around and joins the pursuit. He runs in behind Ruby. James runs faster and is alongside the dog on the left. Ruby runs faster and is alongside the dog on the right. Which child is directly behind the dog?

In the following question, two statements are given each followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if theyseem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statements:
(I) All dogs are rats.
(II) Some rats are lizards. Conclusion:
(I) Some dogs are lizards.
(II) Some lizards are dogs.

Statements : Some rats are cats. Some cats are dogs. No dog is cow.

Conclusions :
I. No cow is cat.
II. No dog is rat.
III. Some cats are rats.

Statements : Some rats are cats. Some cats are dogs. No dog is cow.

Conclusions :
I. No cow is cat.
II. No dog is rat.
III. Some cats are rats.

A number of cats got together and decided to kill between them 999919 rats. Every cat killed an equal number of rats. Each cat killed more rats than there were cats. How many rats do you think that each cat killed ?

Statements : No door is dog. All the dogs are cats.

Conclusions :
I. No door is cat.
II. No cat is door.
III. Some cats are dogs.
IV. All the cats are dogs.

Consider the given statement to be true even if they seem to be at variance with the commonly known facts and decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statement. Statement : Some tigers are cats. All the cats are rats. Conclusions : 1. All the rats are cats. 2. Some of the tigers are rats.