Bissoy
Login
সরাসরি ভিডিও কলে পরামর্শ নিন
Bissoy অ্যাপ এ
পরামর্শ দিয়ে $ টাকা $ উপার্জন করুন
Which country suit against Myanmar on Rohingya issue? (মিয়ানমারের বিরুদ্ধে কোন দেশ রোহিঙ্গা ইস্যুতে মামলা করে?)
ক
Qutar
খ
Bangladesh
গ
Turkey
ঘ
Gambia
সঠিক উত্তর:
Gambia
To constitute a matter of res judicata which of the following conditions must concur?
1. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit or issue must be the same matter which was directly and substantially in issue either actually (section 11, explanation III) or constructively (section 11, explanation IV) in the former suit
2. The former suit must have been a suit between the same parties under whom they or any of them claim. Explanation VI of Section 11 must be read with this condition
3. The parties as aforesaid must have litigated under the same title in the former suit
4. The court which decided the former suit must have been a court competent to try the subsequent suit of the suit in which such issue has been subsequently raised. Explanation II of section 11 is to be read with condition
5. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit must have been heard and finally decided by the court in the first suit. Explanation V of section 11 is to be read with this condition
ক
1, 2
খ
3, 4
গ
2, 4, 5
ঘ
All of these
রোহিঙ্গা গণহত্যার অপরাধে কোন দেশ আন্তর্জাতিক আদালতে মিয়ানমারের বিপক্ষে মামলা করে? (Which country has filed a case against Myanmar in the ICJ for Rohingya Genocide?)
ক
Saudi Arabia
খ
Pakistan
গ
Qatar
ঘ
Gambia
মি. হ্যানয় রোহিঙ্গা সমস্যা সমাধানে একটি আন্তর্জাতিক সংস্থার প্রতিনিধি হিসাবে ঢাকায় কর্মরত আছেন। তিনি মিয়ানমার সামরিক জান্তা এবং বাংলাদেশের পররাষ্ট্রমন্ত্রণালয়ের সাথে রোহিঙ্গা ইস্যুতে মধ্যস্থতা করছেন।মি. হ্যানয় আন্তর্জাতিক কোন সংস্থার সাথে সম্পৃক্ত?
ক
UNDP
খ
UNHCR
গ
UNIFEM
ঘ
UNESCO
In a suit for partition, a Memorandum of Family Settlement is filed and on this basis the partition suit is decreed, but even after disposal of the suit the original Memorandum of Family Settlement remains in the file of the partition suit, then in such situation whether in a suit for eviction by one of the original co-owner of a tenant of a shop of the joint property which has fallen to the share of that co-owner as per the decree passed on the Memorandum of Family Settlement, can the certified copy of the Memorandum of Family Settlement be filed and proved as a public document in the suit against the tenant?
ক
No, it cannot be because the original Memorandum of Family Settlement document which exists in the suit for partition which is disposed of, is a private document and not public document under Section 74 of the Evidence Act
খ
Yes, if a certified copy is obtained of the Memorandum of Family Settlement, and filed in the suit against the tenant, as the certified copy being issued by a court, is a public document
গ
Yes, certified copy obtained from a court of the Memorandum of Family Settlement will be a public document provided that the suit was filed and disposed of by a High Court and not the District Court
ঘ
Yes provided the certified copy of the Memorandum of Family Settlement is sought to be proved by the executants of the memorandum of settlement
In a contractual dispute between two parties A and B, A files a suit in New Delhi where the cause of action arose. Two days later, B files a suit in the same matter in Mumbai, where A is resident. The pendency of the first suit is not brought to the notice of the court in Mumbai. The court pronounces judgement in second suit before the first suit is decided. Would such decision operate as a bar on the court in New Delhi to try the suit any further?
ক
Yes, the principle of res judicata will apply
খ
No, the principle of res judicata only applies against 'former suits.' In this case, the suit in Mumbai was filed subsequent to the suit in Delhi and is therefore not a 'former suit.'
গ
No, because the parties did not disclose the pendency of the previous suit to the Court in Mumbai
ঘ
No, because the plaintiff in the first suit is not the plaintiff in the second suit
In a suit filed by the plaintiff, the defendant in his written statement has taken the objection of non-impleadment of necessary party. Despite such objection the plaintiff continued the suit and the suit finally was decreed. At the first appellate stage, the plaintiff withdraws the suit with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action and subsequently filed a fresh suit. The period spent by the plaintiff in the earlier suit, under section 14 of Limitation Act is
ক
Liable to be excluded on the ground that the plaintiff was prosecuting the earlier suit with due diligence and in good faith
খ
Not liable to be excluded as the plaintiff cannot be said to be prosecuting the earlier suit with due diligence and in good faith
গ
Liable to be excluded under section 14(3) of Limitation Act
ঘ
To be excluded or not to be excluded is in the discretion of the court
মিয়ানমারের বিরুদ্ধে রোহিঙ্গাদের উপর গণহত্যা চালানোর অভিযোগে আইলিডেতে মামলা দায়ের করে
ক
গাম্বিয়া
খ
সেনেগাল
গ
সৌদি আরব
ঘ
কুয়েত
আন্তর্জাতিক আদালতে মিয়ানমার কর্তৃক রোহিঙ্গা গণহত্যার অভিযোগ মামলা করে কোন দেশ?
ক
নাইজেরিয়া
খ
গাম্বিয়া
গ
বাংলাদেশ
ঘ
আলজেরিয়া
Existence of two suits, by parties litigating under same title, one previously instituted which is pending at present and the other filed later, wherein a matter in issue in the subsequently filed suit is directly and substantially in issue in the other and the relief claimed in the subsequent suit can effectively, be passed by the court of previous instance. Which section of Code of Civil Procedure decides the fate of the subsequently filed suit and its proceeding?
ক
Section 9
খ
Section 10
গ
Section 11
ঘ
Section 12
রোহিঙ্গা ইস্যুতে কোন দেশের আর্ন্তজাতিক গণ-আদালতের রায়ে মিয়ানমার কে দোষী সাব্যস্ত করা হয়েছে?
ক
ইন্দোনেশিয়া
খ
মালয়েশিয়া
গ
বাংলাদেশ
ঘ
যুক্তরাজ্য