Bissoy
Login
Get Advice on Live Video Call
Earn $ Cash $ with
consultations on Bissoy App
Panic seized the writer of "The Luncheon" because:
A
he would have no money left over the rest of the mouth
B
he would have to borroe from his guest
C
he feared he would not be able to pay the bill
D
none of the bove
Correct Answer:
he feared he would not be able to pay the bill
'Panic seized the writer' বাক্যেটির passive form হবে--
A
The writer was seized by panic
B
The writer was seized with panic
C
The writer has been seized by panic
D
The writer had been seized with panic
Which of the passive form of the sentence ' panic seized the writer'?
A
The writer was seized by panic
B
The writer seized for panic
C
The writer was seized with panic
D
The writer was seized off panic
Panic seized the writer. Make it passive.
A
The writer was seized with panic
B
The writer was seized by panic
C
The writer was seized for panic
D
None
Which one is the correct passive form of the sentence, "Panic seized me".
A
I was seized by panic
B
I was seized for panic
C
I was seized from panic
D
I was seized with panic
Panic seized me. The passive form will be ---
A
I was seized by panic
B
I was seized from panic
C
I was seized with panic
D
I was seized into panic
The writer in 'The Luncheon ' could not turn down the lady's proposal because -
A
the day was pretty
B
the lady was kind
C
the lady admired his book
D
the writer was young
Who is the writer of the shory "The Luncheon"?
A
William somerset Maugham
B
Sir Walter Scott
C
William Wordsworth
D
Tolstoy
Who is the writer of 'the Luncheon'?
A
William Somerset Maugham
B
Charles Dickens
C
Jane Austen
D
John Milton
The passive form for " Panic seize the writer' is-
A
The writer was seized with the panic
B
The writer seized by the panic
C
The writer was seized into the panic
D
The writer was seized for panic
Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives.
Doing an internship at the University of Lille in France, I almost always found myself stuck whenever I had to speak to non-Indians about India or on anything'Indian'. This was more because of the subtle differences in the way the French understood India in comparison to what I thought was 'Indian'. For instance, when I,or any Indian for that matter, say 'Hindi' is an Indian language, what it means is that it is one of the languages widely spoken in India. This need not be similar tothe understanding that the French would have when they hear of 'Hindi' as an Indian language. Because for them Hindi then becomes the only language spoken inIndia. This is a natural inference that the French, Germans, Italians and many other European nationals would tend to make, because that is generally how it is intheir own respective countries. The risk of such inappropriate generalisations made about 'Indian' is not restricted to language alone but also for India's landscape,cuisine, movies, music, climate, economic development and even political ideologies. The magnitude of diversity of one European country can be easily compared tothat of one of the Indian State, isn't it? Can they imagine that India is one country whose diversity can be equated to that of the entire European continent? Theonus is upon us to go ahead and clarify the nuances in 'Indianness' while we converse. But why should one do so? How does it even matter to clarify? The writer was working at a university in which country?
A
France
B
Germany
C
Italy
D
India